The article claims that scientist find that soft tissue in a fossil of T.rex and provides, which is probably is a remains of blood vessels, red blood cell, three reasons of supports. In contrast, the professor express that this reason is skeptical and hence refuses each of the author's reasons.
First, the passage claims that the soft tissue is to inside the small channels, which may were for blood vessel in fossil leg bones. On the contrary, the speaker opposite this point by saying that the soft tissue it is not necessarily blood, and can be other things. He sates that some bakeries can leaves a soft moist residual.
Second, the reading states that microscopic experiment of the fossil bones show that the tissue contains iron, which a vital material of red blood cell. Conversely, the lecturer refutes this point by expressing that iron may not originate of blood vessels. Hence, the reddish material can has different origination.
In the third place, the text expresses that a scientific test reveals that the bones contain collagen, which is a man component of living bones tissue. In contrast, the professor states that we have not collagen of T. rex, so we never can sure this material relates this animal. According to the professor, the collagen can relate the human skin, who carried the possible bones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a (remains)' or simply 'remains'?
Suggestion: a (remains); remains
....rex and provides, which is probably is a remains of blood vessels, red blood cell, three...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['conversely', 'first', 'hence', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'in contrast', 'on the contrary', 'in the third place']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.285714285714 0.261695866417 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.134920634921 0.158904122519 85% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0833333333333 0.0723426182421 115% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0277777777778 0.0435111971325 64% => OK
Pronouns: 0.015873015873 0.0277247811725 57% => OK
Prepositions: 0.123015873016 0.128828473217 95% => OK
Participles: 0.015873015873 0.0370669169778 43% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.44892322446 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00793650793651 0.0208969081088 38% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.138888888889 0.128158765124 108% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0277777777778 0.0158828679856 175% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0198412698413 0.0114777025283 173% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1340.0 1645.83664459 81% => OK
No of words: 223.0 271.125827815 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.00896860987 6.08160592843 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.04852973271 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.367713004484 0.374372842146 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.260089686099 0.287516216867 90% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.174887892377 0.187439937562 93% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.112107623318 0.113142543107 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44892322446 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565022421525 0.539623497131 105% => OK
Word variations: 53.8722846548 53.8517498576 100% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0529801325 84% => OK
Sentence length: 20.2727272727 21.7502111507 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7269257443 49.3711431718 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.818181818 132.220823453 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 21.7502111507 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 46.2816958826 50.5018328374 92% => OK
Elegance: 2.37777777778 1.90840788429 125% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.691061768495 0.549887131256 126% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.121125524264 0.142949733639 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0725122038024 0.0787303798458 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.653111978565 0.631733273073 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.149283533121 0.139662658121 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.341616363688 0.266732575781 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138338924737 0.103435571967 134% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.408711944929 0.414875509568 99% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0313537571373 0.0530846634433 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.508074204965 0.40443939384 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303765247006 0.0528353158467 57% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.26048565121 164% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 10.2958057395 68% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.