TPO 25
The main idea of both the passage and the talk is about whether clay jars were used as electric batteries or not. Considering this, the author offers three points to indicate that the jars were not utilized as batteries. The professor, on the other hand, not only refutes the author's assessments, but also asserts that the announced option runs counter to the ways the reading just discussed. The lecturer demonstrates three reasons to reject the options in the reading.
The first criticism of the passage against which the lecture argues is that the absent of wires and electricity conductures shows that the jars were not used as batteries. As stated by the professor, the vessels were excavated by local people who were not trained enough to distinguish wires and conductors, and they may overlook or thrown away them.
Moreover, unlike the passage which suggest that the vessels are similar to the copper cylinders, which were discovered in the Seleucia. Due to the fact that copper cylinders were employed for holding scrolls, the vessels may be used for holding scrolls too, the professor illustrates that it is true that the similarity between copper cylinders and the vessels does not prove anything. Additionally, some scientists have found some iron things that prove that the copper cylinders may be used for another purposes like batteries.
Finally, the lecture contradicts the fallacy of the lecture that even if the vessels were used as batteries, they were not useful for ancient people due to the fact that on that time, there were not device that could use electricity, saying that the vessels produced mild shock when they were touched, and they were used to produce invisible power. Furthermore, ancient people may use the vessels as a source of magical power to heal diseases owing to the fact that modern world uses electricity so as to stimulate muscles. Therefore, it is possible that ancient doctors may employ the vessels to cure patients.
All in all, the professor maintains that the arguments in the reading is not convincing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... to reject the options in the reading. The first criticism of the passage against ...
^^^
Line 4, column 317, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[5]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'used to producing'.
Suggestion: used to producing
...k when they were touched, and they were used to produce invisible power. Furthermore, ancient p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 497, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...fact that modern world uses electricity so as to stimulate muscles. Therefore, it is pos...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ments in the reading is not convincing.
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'as to', 'it is true', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.238605898123 0.261695866417 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.182305630027 0.158904122519 115% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0536193029491 0.0723426182421 74% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0563002680965 0.0435111971325 129% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0187667560322 0.0277247811725 68% => OK
Prepositions: 0.123324396783 0.128828473217 96% => OK
Participles: 0.0563002680965 0.0370669169778 152% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.57603226753 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0321715817694 0.0208969081088 154% => OK
Particles: 0.00268096514745 0.00154638098197 173% => OK
Determiners: 0.13672922252 0.128158765124 107% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0160857908847 0.0158828679856 101% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0187667560322 0.0114777025283 164% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2061.0 1645.83664459 125% => OK
No of words: 341.0 271.125827815 126% => OK
Chars per words: 6.04398826979 6.08160592843 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.04852973271 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.360703812317 0.374372842146 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.284457478006 0.287516216867 99% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.17008797654 0.187439937562 91% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.126099706745 0.113142543107 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57603226753 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504398826979 0.539623497131 93% => OK
Word variations: 52.5573055617 53.8517498576 98% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 26.2307692308 21.7502111507 121% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.687520474 49.3711431718 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.538461538 132.220823453 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2307692308 21.7502111507 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.07692307692 0.878197800319 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.39072847682 118% => OK
Readability: 54.6765170314 50.5018328374 108% => OK
Elegance: 1.625 1.90840788429 85% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.764313374626 0.549887131256 139% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.183617600764 0.142949733639 128% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0655585591677 0.0787303798458 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.739196618953 0.631733273073 117% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.124391679827 0.139662658121 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.413879223245 0.266732575781 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1058855247 0.103435571967 102% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.453423840667 0.414875509568 109% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.11625349104 0.0530846634433 219% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.554879338447 0.40443939384 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0817390914989 0.0528353158467 155% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.26048565121 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.2958057395 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.