tpo 27
The main idea of both the passage and the talk is about the causes of Little Ice Age. Considering this, the author offers three reasons for Little Ice Age. The professor, on the other hand, not only refutes the author's assessments, but also asserts that the announced option runs counter to the ways the reading just discusses. The lecturer demonstrates three reasons to reject the options in the passage.
The first criticism of the reading against which the lecture argues is that the reason of the Little Ice Age was the Gulf Stream. As stated by the professor, the Gulf Stream can only affect Europe and north of America, but the Little Ice Age occurred widely in southern hemisphere like southern Africa, which the Gulf Stream had no effect on that area. So, it is a fallacious conclusion that the Gulf Stream is considered as one of the reasons of the Little Ice Age.
Moreover, unlike the passage which claims that volcanic eruption can be another reason of Little Ice Age, the professor illustrates that it is true that if volcanic eruption puts enough dust into the atmosphere, the weather can be cooler. However, there are some documents which are about sunset on that time, and there is no more report about the issue that the sunlight was hidden during that time. Therefore, volcanic eruptions were not strong enough to cause the cooler climate.
Finally, the lecture contradicts the fallacy of the passage that due to the decline in human populations before the Little Ice Age, more trees started growing up in the lands, which were used to utilize as agricultural lands, and as a result the greenhouse effect diminished, and the trees removed more carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, which led to reduction of weather temperature, saying that the human population grew back rapidly, and they started to cut off trees and use lands again. Accordingly, the forest did not last for a long time to cause global cooling of climate.
All in all, the professor maintains that the arguments in the reading are outdated, and new researches have indicated that the information in the passage is not convincing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...o reject the options in the passage. The first criticism of the reading against ...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['accordingly', 'also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'therefore', 'as a result', 'it is true', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.276381909548 0.261695866417 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.133165829146 0.158904122519 84% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0603015075377 0.0723426182421 83% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0552763819095 0.0435111971325 127% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00753768844221 0.0277247811725 27% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.123115577889 0.128828473217 96% => OK
Participles: 0.0251256281407 0.0370669169778 68% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.51458553883 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0201005025126 0.0208969081088 96% => OK
Particles: 0.00502512562814 0.00154638098197 325% => OK
Determiners: 0.158291457286 0.128158765124 124% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00753768844221 0.0158828679856 47% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0175879396985 0.0114777025283 153% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2124.0 1645.83664459 129% => OK
No of words: 360.0 271.125827815 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9 6.08160592843 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.04852973271 108% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.361111111111 0.374372842146 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.241666666667 0.287516216867 84% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.15 0.187439937562 80% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.102777777778 0.113142543107 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51458553883 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505555555556 0.539623497131 94% => OK
Word variations: 53.6829407244 53.8517498576 100% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 27.6923076923 21.7502111507 127% => OK
Sentence length SD: 109.484537289 49.3711431718 222% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 163.384615385 132.220823453 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6923076923 21.7502111507 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 51.858974359 50.5018328374 103% => OK
Elegance: 2.16666666667 1.90840788429 114% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.686243722241 0.549887131256 125% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.155375813488 0.142949733639 109% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0924422524564 0.0787303798458 117% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.724928193083 0.631733273073 115% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.18510687761 0.139662658121 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.376738430172 0.266732575781 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118674363516 0.103435571967 115% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.481361918028 0.414875509568 116% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0982133436169 0.0530846634433 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.503858731787 0.40443939384 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789275336403 0.0528353158467 149% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.2958057395 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.