The reading states that there are some causes of Little Ice Age and provides three reasons of support. The professor, however, explains that the author's arguments are out of date and refutes each of author's reason.
First, the reading claims that the cooling may have been caused by disrupting of ocean currents. The professor contends this point by saying that disrupting of ocean currents was occured only in EU and North of america. He says that it did not happend in Newziland, Africa.
Second, the reading states that the Little Ica age originates from volcanic eruption. The professor refutes this point by saying that although there were enough dust to cooler the earth, it did not so much that become the Little Ica Age. He mentions an example of colorful sunligh to illustrate this. He also says that it was not strong dust need to results in global decreasing tempreture.
Third, the reading states that considerable decreases in human population may have contributed to the cooling of the climate. The professor refutes this point by saying that human population was high in that time regard to previous. And so it was not be enough to results in climate decreasing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 251, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...e regard to previous. And so it was not be enough to results in climate decreasin...
^^
Line 4, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...regard to previous. And so it was not be enough to results in climate decreasing....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, may, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 1373.03311258 72% => OK
No of words: 199.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94472361809 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50545728948 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 145.348785872 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522613065327 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 419.366225166 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The sentence length is short
Sentence length SD: 27.7218325513 49.2860985944 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.0 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5833333333 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08333333333 7.06452816374 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285194987535 0.272083759551 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10407263995 0.0996497079465 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801620837369 0.0662205650399 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167413398732 0.162205337803 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.013480805839 0.0443174109184 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.