The article discusses the causes of little Ice Age cooler and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor states that unfortunately, the author’s arguments are out of date, there is new information that comes up. And he refutes each of the author’s reasons.
First, the reading posits that ocean currents disruption might be the cause of the cooling. The professor opposes this point by explaining that if this idea is true, we would see the effect of ocean current disruption only in Europe and North America. But, the cooling effect reached the southern hemisphere in area, such as New Zealand and Africa. So, if this idea can not explain how the cooling effect reached these places, It cannot explain the little Ice Age too.
Second, the article claims that the dark clouds of dust and sulfur gas resulted from volcanic eruption could have caused the little Ace Age. The professor, on the other hand, says this eruption is true, however, if the dust was so enormous, it could produce visual effects. Such as, people would notice change in the color of the sunlight. He also adds that, unlikely no person in that area had noticed any change. Therefore, this point of volcanic eruption is not strongly enough to justify the lower temperature.
Third, the reading avers that substantial decreases in human populations may have contributed indirectly to the cooling of the climate. As a result, tress became highly growing, Earth became cooler. The professor refutes this point by saying that there was no enough time for forests to stop greenhouse effect. Because the human populations did not take so long time to get back to area, and consequently, more populations, means more trees cut down to clear roads and provide crops. The professor emphasizes that forests do not consider that the caused of little Ice Age.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 191, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ress became highly growing, Earth became cooler. The professor refutes this point...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, third, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 306.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05882352941 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64320707419 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581699346405 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6223685635 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0588235294 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360846684684 0.272083759551 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103906835394 0.0996497079465 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901109688219 0.0662205650399 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198912627098 0.162205337803 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607878044626 0.0443174109184 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.