The lecture and reading both discus the little age and it's reason. While reading states that it might be cause because of the oceanic current changes, volcanic eruptions and due to increasing in the forest, the lecture refutes these by claiming that ice age did not occur in southern part, there evidence for volcanic ash-large scale and there were no enough long time to causes the global cooling.
First of all, the reading claims that it might happened because oceanic current changes which occur in gulf of mexico in the past which might drop the temperature and eventually became little ice age from inter-glacial period. However, the professor opposes this view by saying that it did not happen in southern part earth like South Africa and Newzesland. It happened only on the north part of earth, so, this causing some doubt first theory.
In addition, reading suggests that it could be because of volcanic eruptions because dust and sulphur in clouds leads to block the sunlight which in long term enough to make little ice-age, due to prolong droping of temperature in the atmosphere. Lecturer counter this point with some ideas-if, there were eruptions occurred, then there must visual striking on the sky like rainbow, but, there was report presented regarding that events.
Finally, passage states that growing forest during that might be caused the little ice-age, those period- war, disease and socio-political conflicts led the population very less and need for farmland became smaller in size, so, they might grew the forest, that, indeed reduce the global temperature by absorbing more co2 from atmosphere. Thus, earth became little ice age. The speaker refuses this view by explaining that to do it takes more than thousands of year, that's not happend at all. Moreover, the population became previous status very quickly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: BE_CAUSE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'because'?
Suggestion: because
...son. While reading states that it might be cause because of the oceanic current changes,...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 64, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng claims that it might happened because oceanic current changes which occur in g...
^^
Line 3, column 251, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r-glacial period. However, the professor opposes this view by saying that it did ...
^^^
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e little ice-age, due to prolong droping of temperature in the atmosphere. Lectur...
^^
Line 5, column 258, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'counters'.
Suggestion: counters
...temperature in the atmosphere. Lecturer counter this point with some ideas-if, there we...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 208, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: smaller
... very less and need for farmland became smaller in size, so, they might grew the forest, that, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 467, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...o it takes more than thousands of year, thats not happend at all. Moreover, the popul...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...became previous status very quickly.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, then, thus, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 301.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15946843854 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40086499278 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56146179402 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 102.528125551 49.2860985944 208% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 141.181818182 110.228320801 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3636363636 21.698381199 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.36363636364 7.06452816374 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35894856667 0.272083759551 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138795367226 0.0996497079465 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885663108147 0.0662205650399 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218001159943 0.162205337803 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266232194835 0.0443174109184 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.7273730684 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.