The article states that Robert E.peary had reached to the North Pole on april, 7, 1909 and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor expalins that there are no soild evidences that Peary did so and she refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading avers that the inversitgation results that done by National geographic Society supports the claim of Robert Peary reached the North Pole. The professor opposes this point by saying that this investigation is cimpletetly objectives. Because the committe members were, infact, Pole's friends, and also they were financially supportering him for his trip. Also, she mentions that this investigation only took 2 days and not examined evidences fully, so this was biased and not trustworhty.
Second , the article posits that recent expedition support peary's claim that he reached the Pole during 37 days only. A british explorer named Tom Avery had done this expedition. The professor, on the other hand, explains that there are two difference between Peay and Avery trips. For example, the sildes that used in Avery trip were less weight because his food was transported on the plane. Moreover, the waether conditions was so favorable compared to the conditions during Peary's trip. So, this speedy issue did not proof that Peary reached The North Pole.
Third, the reading claims that there are photographs taken By Robert E. Peary clearly support his claim. This was done by measuring the surf's position. The professor refutes this point by explaining these images do not proof this claim. SHe emphasizes that these photos was taken by old, primitive camera, which produce unfocused pictures. And, consequently, we cannot make any precise calculations. Another thing, these photographs are faded overtime and became so unclear. She conculdes this photographs are not so grat evidence to consider Peary's claim that he reached The North Pole.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 7, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...as biased and not trustworhty. Second , the article posits that recent expediti...
^^
Line 5, column 538, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is speedy issue did not proof that Peary reached The North Pole. Third, the re...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, third, another thing, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 22.412803532 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 306.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27777777778 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59097538684 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 145.348785872 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565359477124 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.1953121478 49.2860985944 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.75 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452733414324 0.272083759551 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145990938086 0.0996497079465 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134082982438 0.0662205650399 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.301261362082 0.162205337803 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404450312941 0.0443174109184 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.75 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 63.6247240618 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.