In view of the reading, the author enumerates that this is impossible to Sinosauropteryx had feathers by pointing out three reasons of support by studying their fossil skeleton. Finding the statements arguable, the lecturer casts doubt on the claim made by the article and presents pieces of evidence in contrary.
At first, the author argues that the line on the Sinosauropteryx is not a symbol of functional structure of living dinosaurs and they had been created after the Sinosauropteryx's death by decomposing their skin to fibers. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that there is no record for decomposing for the fossile of other known animals which buried in volcanic ash. They maintain complete and it could not be a good idea for the basis of these lines.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that there is a chance that this line was related to the frills, the ornamental fan-shaped structure which many dinosaurs had. On the other hand, the lecturer disputes this point by clarifying the fact that there is a chemical difference between the frills and feathers and the frills do not have Betacarotene. By recent research, it has been shown that there are some Betacarotene in the Sinosauropteryx's fossils which shows they could have feathers.
Finally, the author asserts the backbone and tail which most of the lines located on them as the last point for supporting that this structure could be useless and there is no chance to consider flight ability for the Sinosauropteryx. The lecturer, though, dismisses it by elucidating that the feather is not just for the regulation of the temperature or fly, they could have used for other function like pick up. Also, the lecturer says that the researcher found some colorful things which could be a sign of having the feathers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In view of the reading, the author enume...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ents pieces of evidence in contrary. At first, the author argues that the lin...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d idea for the basis of these lines. In addition, the reading passage holds t...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hich shows they could have feathers. Finally, the author asserts the backbone...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, if, so, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 302.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01986754967 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85858071547 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523178807947 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.6871464821 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.818181818 110.228320801 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4545454545 21.698381199 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35465205224 0.272083759551 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128563529982 0.0996497079465 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880085750437 0.0662205650399 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215512100749 0.162205337803 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624067355209 0.0443174109184 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.3589403974 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.8541721854 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.0289183223 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.