The lecture disproves what is argued in the reading material. According to the passsage, three hypothesizes are claimed to explain "quackers",which the Russian submarines detected in the ocean. The professor talks about the same issue. However, she disagrees with all these theories and then represents three evidences to demonstrate her idea.
For one thing, while the passage mentions that the sound could be produced by ocra whales, the professor rebuts this by saying that ocra whales live in the surface of the ocean, submarines that move in the deep ocean cannot detect the sound from that distance. By the way, if the sound is created by the whales, then the submarines can detect their existance. However, there is no evidence that the submarines find any ocra whales around.
Furthermore, contrary to the claims in the reading that the "quackers" comes from the giant squid, the professor insists this is not true. This is because if the sound is made by the giant squid, there is no explanation sbout why the sound apeared in the 1960s and then suddenly disappeared after two decades.
Finally, the professor asserts that the sound cannot from any military technology, which is against the passage. This is because even in today, scientists cannot build a submarine moving in that fast speed and changing direction repidly, and still sustaining silence to the extent that no other submarines can detect them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , which
... claimed to explain 'quackers',which the Russian submarines detected in the ...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'while', 'by the way', 'for one thing']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.231884057971 0.261695866417 89% => OK
Verbs: 0.148550724638 0.158904122519 93% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0398550724638 0.0723426182421 55% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0579710144928 0.0435111971325 133% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0144927536232 0.0277247811725 52% => OK
Prepositions: 0.119565217391 0.128828473217 93% => OK
Participles: 0.0434782608696 0.0370669169778 117% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.01484351803 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Infinitives: 0.018115942029 0.0208969081088 87% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.163043478261 0.128158765124 127% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0217391304348 0.0158828679856 137% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.018115942029 0.0114777025283 158% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1444.0 1645.83664459 88% => OK
No of words: 233.0 271.125827815 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.1974248927 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.04852973271 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.364806866953 0.374372842146 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.274678111588 0.287516216867 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.19313304721 0.187439937562 103% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.128755364807 0.113142543107 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01484351803 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55364806867 0.539623497131 103% => OK
Word variations: 52.9367204098 53.8517498576 98% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0529801325 84% => OK
Sentence length: 21.1818181818 21.7502111507 97% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1191869589 49.3711431718 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.272727273 132.220823453 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1818181818 21.7502111507 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 48.6496293406 50.5018328374 96% => OK
Elegance: 1.7868852459 1.90840788429 94% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.653069670366 0.549887131256 119% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.148074962609 0.142949733639 104% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.113527178342 0.0787303798458 144% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.668031040457 0.631733273073 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.166436243154 0.139662658121 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.352989627702 0.266732575781 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116139266703 0.103435571967 112% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.466392474803 0.414875509568 112% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0697426893323 0.0530846634433 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.494447853414 0.40443939384 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553193504946 0.0528353158467 105% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.49668874172 29% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.2958057395 97% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.