The reading passage and the lecture both discuss the carved stone balls. These stone balls found at many areas in Scotland. The author states that three possible argumentations about the mystery use of them. While the professor says, no one of these theories are persuasive.
First, the author claims that these stone balls utilized as weapons during the war. However, the professor casts douth at this point by explaining that there are neither marks nor cracks on the surface of the stone balls. Conversely. The surface of these balls are smooth and another things we have to but in the consideration that during the war a lot of the arrows were used. Besides, these arrows caused massive damages to the surface of the stone balls, and nothing likes this happened.
Second, the reading passage stats the using of the stone balls for weighting. But the professor claims that by telling the average weight of each stone balls differ from other even the same size. And this because the substances used in making these balls are different such as graves or other.
Third, the author discusses that these engrave balls were anticipated for social means. Moreover, the speaker explains that these balls not buried beside the famous person to consider them as special meaning. And these balls were not complicated, but they are so simple in design to determine them as a social meant.
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: The surface of these balls are smooth and another things we have to but in the consideration that during the war a lot of the arrows were used.
Description: A determiner/pronoun, singular is not usually followed by a noun, plural, common
Suggestion: Refer to another and things
These stone balls found at many areas in Scotland.
These stone balls are found at many areas in Scotland.
these stone balls utilized as weapons during the war
these stone balls are utilized as weapons during the war
these balls not buried beside the famous person
these balls are not buried beside the famous person
Sentence: However, the professor casts douth at this point by explaining that there are neither marks nor cracks on the surface of the stone balls.
Error: douth Suggestion: south
---------------------
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 20 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 15 12
No. of Words: 233 250
No. of Characters: 1120 1200
No. of Different Words: 128 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.907 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.807 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.214 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 76 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 48 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 23 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 15 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.533 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.355 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.8 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.353 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.554 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.139 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 224, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Conversely,
...acks on the surface of the stone balls. Conversely. The surface of these balls are smooth ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 493, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...balls, and nothing likes this happened. Second, the reading passage stats the us...
^^^^
Line 4, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gn to determine them as a social meant.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, conversely, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, third, while, another thing, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1152.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 233.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94420600858 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30050124799 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557939914163 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 351.9 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.2590120584 49.2860985944 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.2857142857 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6428571429 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358171856014 0.272083759551 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135735626756 0.0996497079465 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673039400731 0.0662205650399 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225018758449 0.162205337803 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361092287292 0.0443174109184 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.