The reading passage and the lecture both discuss a massive mammal known as Steller sea caw, who lived in the water on the coast of Siberia, T6he author states three possible notions about the causes of the evanescence. However, the speaker avers that we do not know the exact causes of the extinction, and there is a problem with each submitted reasons.
First, the author claims the native Siberian people were feeding on the the sea caw that thing leads to their disappearance. While the professor casts douth at this point by explaining that the sea caw is giant, and it weights about 100 tans. The huge weight was enough to feed the Serbian people for a month. Moreover, the native population was not large at that time. So they not needed to hunt a lot.
Second, the author argues the ecosystem disruption affected the kelp. This type of the plant that feeds the sea caw. Conversely, the speaker discusses the ecosystem disturbance never accrued at that time because if that thing really happened this would affect on the other marine population such as whales. He says, no report of that was submitted.
Third, the author points out the European fur treader hunted the sea caw that leads to their destruction. But, the speaker explains that the sea caw already extinct before the treader settled the island. Another thing should be we put on your consideration, the sea population was low at the time the trader arrived, and other causes give rise to that annihilation.
Essay evaluation report
each submitted reasons.
each submitted reason.
the native Siberian people were feeding on the the sea caw that thing leads to their disappearance.
the native Siberian people were feeding on the the sea caw that leads to their disappearance.
So they not needed to hunt a lot.
So they did not need to hunt a lot.
-----------------------
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2 //read a good grammar book
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 22 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 12
No. of Words: 255 250
No. of Characters: 1190 1200
No. of Different Words: 149 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.996 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.667 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.34 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 82 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 52 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 26 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 19 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.214 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.874 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.714 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.333 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.407 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.081 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 2 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... native Siberian people were feeding on the the sea caw that thing leads to their disap...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... native Siberian people were feeding on the the sea caw that thing leads to their disap...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 254, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...f that thing really happened this would affect on the other marine population such as wha...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, however, if, moreover, really, second, so, third, while, another thing, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1228.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 255.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81568627451 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45928319186 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592156862745 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 363.6 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.8089911438 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7142857143 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2142857143 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06452816374 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288047909399 0.272083759551 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0975794284158 0.0996497079465 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506090086582 0.0662205650399 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174470626827 0.162205337803 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410087243391 0.0443174109184 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.8541721854 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.