TPO 39
The professor explains three clear arguments opposing the points stated in the reading passage about the plausible explanations of Triassic mass-extinction in 200 million years ago which caused dinosaurs became major species in the world for about 145 million years.
First, the professor argues that sea levels in coastal and shallow oceans were fluctuated regularly and those were adapted to such changes. So, if sea levels' decline was major reason for extinction, it would change suddenly because sea levels were went down about several million years.
Second, it is mentioned in the reading passage that sulfur dioxide, which emitted through volcanic activities, could cause global temperature fall down, therefore, destroyed many creatures, organisms and species that established the massive extinction. On the contrary, the professor draws that SO2 can change temperature but its impact is not permanent and sulfur dioxide's effect is sustain for only limited period of time. Furthermore, sulfur dioxide usually combine with water and vapor can fall back to the Earth as rain. Thus, it couldn't be major reason for extinction.
Third and last, the reading passage asserts that an asteroid hit to the Earth's surface, which cause rocks crush, spread a huge amount of soil to the atmosphere and makes a crater, prevents sunlight to reach surface. So, many plants and animals died due to lack of energy and food. In contrast, the professor disproves the idea because of the fact that very few scientists were accept it. They couldn't find any reliable evidence of an asteroid crater belongs to that period of time. The only crater, which they have found, is related to 12 millions years before Triassic massive-extinction that is too far to consider its impact.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ides effect is sustain for only limited period of time. Furthermore, sulfur dioxide usually co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 535, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...all back to the Earth as rain. Thus, it couldnt be major reason for extinction. Third ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 327, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...trast, the professor disproves the idea because of the fact that very few scientists were accept it. The...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 377, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'accepted'.
Suggestion: accepted
... the fact that very few scientists were accept it. They couldnt find any reliable evid...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 377, Rule ID: ACCEPT_EXCEPT[3]
Message: Did you mean 'except'?
Suggestion: except
... the fact that very few scientists were accept it. They couldnt find any reliable evid...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 393, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ery few scientists were accept it. They couldnt find any reliable evidence of an astero...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 466, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...e of an asteroid crater belongs to that period of time. The only crater, which they have found...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, therefore, third, thus, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 282.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25531914894 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61782839425 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 145.348785872 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613475177305 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.0329520957 49.2860985944 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.5 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06452816374 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.3589403974 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.