TPO 4
The reading passage says some scientists believe that dinosaurs were endothermal animals and provides three reasons for support for this argument. In contrast, the professor refutes it and states that this argument cannot prove anything and the reasons are not supportive.
First, the reading explains that scientists have found dinosaur fossils in the polar regions. On the other hand, the professor says that this is not a good reason because, in the past, polar regions were much warmer than now then as a result, dinosaurs could easily live in these warm places. In addition, if these places were cold as much as polar regions the dinosaurs could migrate to warmer places or hibernate such as other reptiles. Therefore this reason is not true.
Second, the reading claims that between leg position and endothermy is a connection. But the professor states that the fact that underneath position of legs are not necessary for being endotherm. Because in some animals such as dinosaurs, the body is high weight and if the legs locate underneath, the body would have a problem.
Finally, the reading section states that in the endothermal animals, bone cells usually have Haversian canals. In contrast, the professor refutes this argument and states that in addition to Haversian canals, the bone cells of dinosaurs have growth rings. According to the professor, growth rings show periodic growth. It means that in the warm weather the animal has fast growth rate. And in the cold weather, the animal has slow growth rate. However, the endotherm animals have a fast growth rate in both warm and cold weather. That is why they do not show growth ring.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 439, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...es or hibernate such as other reptiles. Therefore this reason is not true. Second, the r...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, in addition, in contrast, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 274.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05109489051 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42999925343 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492700729927 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 411.3 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.5043101313 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.125 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.