TPO 4 integrate writing topic
The passage indicates that dinosaurs were endotherms and gives some ideas approving this idea. However, The lecturer illustrates that some points mentioned in the passage about the dinosaurs being endotherms are not accurate.
First, the reading passage states that some dinosaurs fossils were discovered in the polar regions. For instance, this may be a prove that dinosaurs were endotherms, as only endotherms animals are able to live in such a cold environment. However, the lecturer said that there is no proof that those areas were cold as now. Even if it was cold, the dinosaurs might have migrated or hibernated during the cold seasons.
Second, the reading passage claims that the legs position of dinosaurs is also an example in the direction of the theory of dinosaurs being endotherms. Nevertheless, the lecturer again thinks the legs position of dinosaurs was under the body in order to stand the heavyweight of them, not for running, which is a characteristic of endotherms animals.
Finally, the reading passage includes Haversian canals as another proof, which are a sort of canals have nerves and blood vessels which allow the fast growth of the endotherms animals. However, the lecturer talks about growth rings, which are areas of thickness in the bones of dinosaurs. These rings support the idea that dinosaurs stopped or slowed their growth for a while, which might be during hibernating.
As a result, there is still a debate about whether the dinosaurs are endotherms or not. Each team has his own proofs of his theory and it seems that more research should be done.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...olar regions. For instance, this may be a prove that dinosaurs were endotherms, as only...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...istic of endotherms animals. Finally, the reading passage includes Haversian c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, still, while, for instance, sort of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1339.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1106870229 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64023113856 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515267175573 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2364032856 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1538461538 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76923076923 7.06452816374 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.