TPO 4 Integrated
In the reading, the author claims that dinosaurs, which were the ancestors of modern reptiles, were varied from their contemporary generations and were endotherm by pointing out 3 reasons of support. However, finding all the ideas questionable and implausible, the lecturer casts doubt on what is presented in the text and presents some evidence to the contrary.
At first, the author argues that living in polar areas is a firm proof regarding this issue that dinosaurs were endotherm. Conversely, the lecturer brings up this idea that the Polar Regions were much warmer than today so that dinosaurs could easily live there in part of the year. Furthermore, another viable reason is that dinosaurs could immigrate or hibernate in cold periods of the years. Therefore, being in pole would not be acceptable evidence that prove this feature in dinosaurs.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view point that this point that the dinosaurs' leg placed underneath their body instead of at their body side, have another explanation. In fact, if their legs were located at the sides of the animal's body, they would not have been capable to support the huge weight of their body. Consequently, they actually needed such tools since they were growing in a large size. So dinosaurs' leg position was under their body, but it was not due the running purposes nonetheless.
Finally, the author asserts that the bone structure of the fossils, which were contained Haversian canals, as the last point for supporting the claims that dinosaurs were endotherm. The lecturer, though, dismiss it by pointing out that the dinosaurs did have the Haversian canals, but there are further indicators that revealed they did not have constant and regular growth. Indeed, in cooled periods they slow down or stop their growing trend, though endotherms animals have rapidly and contentiously growing trend.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, consequently, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, nonetheless, regarding, so, therefore, in addition, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 306.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17647058824 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5801434875 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571895424837 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8534600111 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.846153846 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5384615385 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9230769231 7.06452816374 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.