The reading passage and the lecture both discuss the possibility of living on planet Venus and offer opposing views on it. The author in that passage states that due to aggrassive conditions on the Venus it is impossible for humans to live there someday. However, The professor in the lecture challenges what the author proposes and refutes all the reason by providing scientific facts about having floating station in the atmosphere of Venus instead of having a station on the surface of the planet.
First, The author highlights that the atmospheric pressure for Venus's surface is too great for the equipment and the humans and there is no change for them to bear this pressure. Not having been convinced, the speaker asserts that atmospheric pressure at 50 Km above the surface of the Venus is approximately equal to that of the Earth. He further proceeds to say that in this pressure the spacecraft carrying humans can float in the Venus atmosohere without getting crushed.
Moreover, the passage contends that it is necassary to provide water and oxygen supply for the station from Earth which is practically impossible. On the contrary, the lecture declares that there a lot carbon dioxide resources on the Venus and it is possible to gain oxygen and water from these sources by chemical processes. He delineates by using this method, the humans in the station above the Venus can have the resources of oxygen and water without any help from outside of Venus.
Finally, the lecturor does not approve the third reason provided by the reading passage which is lack of sunlight on the Venus's surface. He elabotares that on the 50 Km orbit above the surface, the clouds are not that much thick and there are enough light for the spacecraft traveling around the Venus surface. He continues to say that not only the sunlight, but also its reflections from the clouds are adequate to produce electricity from solar power cell and consequently, humans can live there.
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'consequently', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'third', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.265536723164 0.261695866417 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.141242937853 0.158904122519 89% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0508474576271 0.0723426182421 70% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0536723163842 0.0435111971325 123% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0282485875706 0.0277247811725 102% => OK
Prepositions: 0.155367231638 0.128828473217 121% => OK
Participles: 0.0423728813559 0.0370669169778 114% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.56627036314 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0254237288136 0.0208969081088 122% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.149717514124 0.128158765124 117% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00847457627119 0.0158828679856 53% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00847457627119 0.0114777025283 74% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1973.0 1645.83664459 120% => OK
No of words: 332.0 271.125827815 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.94277108434 6.08160592843 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.04852973271 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.370481927711 0.374372842146 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.274096385542 0.287516216867 95% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.174698795181 0.187439937562 93% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.105421686747 0.113142543107 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56627036314 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478915662651 0.539623497131 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 48.6179559623 53.8517498576 90% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0529801325 92% => OK
Sentence length: 27.6666666667 21.7502111507 127% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0705602279 49.3711431718 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.416666667 132.220823453 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 21.7502111507 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.916666666667 0.878197800319 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 55.0763052209 50.5018328374 109% => OK
Elegance: 2.07594936709 1.90840788429 109% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.676476695423 0.549887131256 123% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.199320704946 0.142949733639 139% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0581941435852 0.0787303798458 74% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.715578413069 0.631733273073 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0738075032632 0.139662658121 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.384063888814 0.266732575781 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773954985169 0.103435571967 75% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.529967148764 0.414875509568 128% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0229048205019 0.0530846634433 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.548481220167 0.40443939384 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0231905282137 0.0528353158467 44% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.2958057395 97% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.