The article claims that ethanol fuel, which made from plants like corn and sugar cane, can not be a good replacement of gasoline and provide three reasons of support. In contrast, the professor express that ethanol fuel can be an alternative to gasoline, hence he refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading states that the use ethanol fuel can not solve the biggest environmental problems, which is called global warming, because this fuel produce carbon dioxide into atmosphere. On contrary, the professor opposes this point with saying that ethanol can ameliorates this environmental problem. For producing ethanol we need to grow up planets that they absorb carbon dioxide, which is released by burning ethanol fuel.
Second, the passage mentions that producing ethanol from corn reduces the food source for farm animals. Conversely, the lecturer refutes this matter by expressing that ethanol fuel is produce from a certain materials that we can use other kinds of plants to make ethanol fuel. So, we never face the lack of foods for farm animals.
In the third place, the text expresses that ethanol fuel can not be economical without the government’s subsidies. In contrast, the speaker says that if we increase the production of ethanol fuel, its price will be decreased. Hence, ethanol fuel can compete with gasoline on price, eve without the government's aids.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 268, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'ameliorate'
Suggestion: ameliorate
...this point with saying that ethanol can ameliorates this environmental problem. For produci...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'material'?
Suggestion: material
... ethanol fuel is produce from a certain materials that we can use other kinds of plants t...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['conversely', 'first', 'hence', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'in contrast', 'in the third place']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.296875 0.261695866417 113% => OK
Verbs: 0.15625 0.158904122519 98% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0625 0.0723426182421 86% => OK
Adverbs: 0.02734375 0.0435111971325 63% => OK
Pronouns: 0.02734375 0.0277247811725 99% => OK
Prepositions: 0.140625 0.128828473217 109% => OK
Participles: 0.03515625 0.0370669169778 95% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.64025798228 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.01171875 0.0208969081088 56% => OK
Particles: 0.00390625 0.00154638098197 253% => OK
Determiners: 0.09765625 0.128158765124 76% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.03125 0.0158828679856 197% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.015625 0.0114777025283 136% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1396.0 1645.83664459 85% => OK
No of words: 224.0 271.125827815 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.23214285714 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.04852973271 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.401785714286 0.374372842146 107% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.330357142857 0.287516216867 115% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.169642857143 0.187439937562 91% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.111607142857 0.113142543107 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64025798228 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.539623497131 106% => OK
Word variations: 54.9936303886 53.8517498576 102% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0529801325 84% => OK
Sentence length: 20.3636363636 21.7502111507 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5583292916 49.3711431718 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.909090909 132.220823453 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 21.7502111507 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.818181818182 0.878197800319 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 53.3993506494 50.5018328374 106% => OK
Elegance: 2.24074074074 1.90840788429 117% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314044305782 0.549887131256 57% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.12456985564 0.142949733639 87% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0568118089185 0.0787303798458 72% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.657941676398 0.631733273073 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.101274869922 0.139662658121 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168588018293 0.266732575781 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570260008719 0.103435571967 55% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.344684240386 0.414875509568 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0527572175193 0.0530846634433 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237055705273 0.40443939384 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247220805763 0.0528353158467 47% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.26048565121 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 3.1766004415 157% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.2958057395 97% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.