In this set of materials, the reading passage explores three effective solutions to prevent birds from injured by hitting on glass, and the professor's lecture deals with the same topic. However, he casts doubts on these solutions, and in the lecture, he provides three specific points to substantiate his opinion.
To begin with, although the reading passage suggests that replacing regular glass with one-way glass could prevent birds from flying through it, the professor argues in the lecture that one-way glass, which serves as mirrors, reflects skies or trees outside the building. Accordingly, birds will fly to the reflection of skies or trees outside the building. Clearly, professor's argument refutes its counterpart in the reading.
Moreover, despite the statement in the reading that painting colorful lines or designs, which humans can see through the opening, on window glass is also a solution, the professor contends that birds will fly through window glass since birds regard these openings as big holes. He supports this point with the fact that those unpainted areas on the window glass are small and darken the buildings.
Finally, the author of the reading claims that using magnetic signals to guide birds away from the building is also a feasible solution, whereas the professor asserts that birds only use their magnetic skills when traveling long distances, such as when flying to warm areas rather than cities to cities. Then he explains that this claim is indefensible by pointing out that birds use their sight and the sense of brightness of light to direct their way while traveling short distances, for instance, flying in the city.
Discourse Markers used:
['accordingly', 'also', 'finally', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'then', 'whereas', 'while', 'for instance', 'such as', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.26936026936 0.261695866417 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.144781144781 0.158904122519 91% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0572390572391 0.0723426182421 79% => OK
Adverbs: 0.037037037037 0.0435111971325 85% => OK
Pronouns: 0.03367003367 0.0277247811725 121% => OK
Prepositions: 0.164983164983 0.128828473217 128% => OK
Participles: 0.037037037037 0.0370669169778 100% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.44590334937 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.026936026936 0.0208969081088 129% => OK
Particles: 0.003367003367 0.00154638098197 218% => OK
Determiners: 0.107744107744 0.128158765124 84% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.013468013468 0.0158828679856 85% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.013468013468 0.0114777025283 117% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1661.0 1645.83664459 101% => OK
No of words: 268.0 271.125827815 99% => OK
Chars per words: 6.19776119403 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.04852973271 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.391791044776 0.374372842146 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.305970149254 0.287516216867 106% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.208955223881 0.187439937562 111% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.108208955224 0.113142543107 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44590334937 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563432835821 0.539623497131 104% => OK
Word variations: 57.2362119244 53.8517498576 106% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0529801325 69% => OK
Sentence length: 29.7777777778 21.7502111507 137% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.0448339419 49.3711431718 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 184.555555556 132.220823453 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7777777778 21.7502111507 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.44444444444 0.878197800319 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 60.3747927032 50.5018328374 120% => OK
Elegance: 2.1875 1.90840788429 115% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.632721630986 0.549887131256 115% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.160499578902 0.142949733639 112% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0879310515187 0.0787303798458 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.718823941906 0.631733273073 114% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.150046360717 0.139662658121 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.312796143196 0.266732575781 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113543325714 0.103435571967 110% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.370222476526 0.414875509568 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0568510721201 0.0530846634433 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.428638808951 0.40443939384 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0622688945591 0.0528353158467 118% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.49668874172 172% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.