The author and the speaker both discuss the three possible ideas to manage the harmful effect of using the glass material in the building architectures. While the reader submits solutions to this glass material, the speaker counters these specific points and presents some clues to call into the information in the passage.
First, the reader claims the one-way class as one of the solutions to prevent the birds from injured. However, the speaker casts doubt on this idea by explaining that replacing the regular glass with one- way one is not the efficient solution. Because of the reflection of the one-way glass, and like a mirror image. Perhaps, the birds will fly directly to the mirror image reflection produced by the one- way glass. As we know the bird go to the sky or the tree because of the reflection occurs due to the sunlight.
Second, the author states the colorful glass also as another suggestion. The professor avers this point by telling that the bird will go forward through space between the two lines instead of avoiding. And trying to decrease this space between the lines is not ideal because it leads to making the room darker.
Third, the author argues the magnetic field also the third idea. Conversely, the professor says the magnetic field utilized by the birds only when they traveled to the long distance as in the winter. The birds moved from cold to the warm area, so they use this magnetic field. While in the short distance they use their eyes and light to know where they go, so the magnetic field is not a valid opinion.
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 21 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 12
No. of Words: 272 250
No. of Characters: 1258 1200
No. of Different Words: 141 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.061 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.625 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.218 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 80 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 61 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 36 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 14 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.429 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.165 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.571 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.353 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.614 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.152 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 405, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... magnetic field is not a valid opinion.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, however, if, second, so, third, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1290.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74264705882 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30788665893 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533088235294 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5862925579 49.2860985944 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1428571429 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 7.06452816374 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388350484226 0.272083759551 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131170137026 0.0996497079465 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559622643154 0.0662205650399 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198771185717 0.162205337803 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062479142266 0.0443174109184 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.