Tpo 43
The article states that the archeologists believe that the coin which is found in North America which comes from European is not a genuine piece of historical evidence but a historical fake, and it provides three reasons for support. However, the professor claims that the archeologists think that the coin discussed in the reading is a genuine piece, and he refutes each author's reasons.
First, the reading asserts that the great distance from the place where the coin was discovered far from the sites documenting in a North America. The lecture counters this point by saying the great distance is not a big deal. In fact, there are other objects found far away not only the coin because the native of North America traveled a great distance. They were interesting to obtain the object from a distance. As a result, native North America traveled and brought these coin.
Second, the reading points out that no other coin found in the Canadian sites that inhabitant by Norse. The professor contradicts this idea by telling that this reason does not necessarily prove the idea. Indeed, the native of North America does not stay there permanently; instead, they are back to European and took the coin with them.
Third, the reading explains that the Nores already understood that there is no benefit to take the silver coin because it is valued just in European, not in North America. However, the professor claims that it is correct that the coin is not viewed as money there, but the people of the North America value this coin as an attractive and appealing thing. Indeed, they used this coin in manufacturing jewelry and necklaces and used it to rade with them.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second, so, third, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 285.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87719298246 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45324641542 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473684210526 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 427.5 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1719061734 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.923076923 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61538461538 7.06452816374 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0631090314536 0.272083759551 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0300877156955 0.0996497079465 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0255637597349 0.0662205650399 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.043671891617 0.162205337803 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0178647100991 0.0443174109184 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.