Tpo 43
The article states that there are three theories explain what the agnostids ate and how it behaves which is the marine animals that became extinct before 450 billion years and provides three reasons for support. However, the professor states that all the three theories mentioned in the r4eading are weak, and he refutes each of the reading reasons.
First, the reading claims that the agnostics are the free-swimming predators who hunted small animals. The lecture counters this point by saying that if the agnostids consider a predator, they should have large well-developed eyes. In fact, the agnostics have a small eye. Therefore, if they are predators should have another sensory organ, but there is no evidence that the agnostids have other organs.
Second, the reading asserts that the agnostics may have dwelled on the sea floor. The professor contradicts this idea by telling that the sea floor creatures have the ability to move slowly and stay in the localized geographical areas. However, the agnostics living in the multiple geographic areas and move fast. So the agnostids are unusual to be a sea floor dwellers.
Third, the reading points out that the third theory is the agnostics could be parasites. However, the professor demonstrates that the parasites are just a small population and limited in number. In fact, the agnostids are large population. Therefore, agnostids could not be parasites.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
The article states that there are three theories explain what the agnostids ate
The article states that there are three theories to explain what the agnostids ate
Therefore, if they are predators should have another sensory organ,
Therefore, if they are predators, they should have another sensory organ,
the third theory is the agnostics could be parasites.
the third theory is that the agnostics could be parasites.
In fact, the agnostids are large population.
In fact, the agnostids are in large population.
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2 //Double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 22 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 12
No. of Words: 228 250
No. of Characters: 1155 1200
No. of Different Words: 119 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.886 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.066 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.558 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 86 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 69 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 42 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 32 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.286 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.667 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.857 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.375 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.594 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.109 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, third, well, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 30.3222958057 46% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1194.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 228.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23684210526 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63434065613 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539473684211 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.0962973544 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2857142857 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2857142857 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.06452816374 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31335537235 0.272083759551 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110112820603 0.0996497079465 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066399662229 0.0662205650399 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175860011652 0.162205337803 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627359561842 0.0443174109184 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.