TPO 43 INTEGRATED
There has been some debates among where the angostides were living in the past . The reading provides three different theories about where they were living in the past. The lecture refutes, saying that each of the theories mentioned in the reading has some weakens.
The first area of dispute is the ability of the agnostides to live as free swimming predator. The lecturer contends that free swimming predators should have large developed eye and special sensory organs in their bodies to help them catch the prey, however the angistoids were lacking these characteristics. On the other hand, the reading opposes this point stating that they were strong predators and active swimmers.
Another controversial issue that the agntoids were dwellers of the sea flower. The professor says that the dwellers of the sea flower were moving slowly. They were localized in one area. However, angistoids were moving too fast. According to their fossils they were localized in different places. But, the passage contradicts this point saying that they were living as dweller of the sea flower and scavenging dead organism and grazing bacteria.
The final point of dispute is that agnostide were parasites living on large organisms. The lecture claims that the parasite's population should be small or they will harm their hosts. According to the fossils of angostide there population were very large and that contradict the theory of parasites. yet, the author of the reading refutes this point and saying that many anthropoids that are living those days are parasite, which reflect that agnosite were parasite as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
There has been some debates among where the angostides were living in the ...
^^
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e the angostides were living in the past . The reading provides three different th...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed in the reading has some weakens. The first area of dispute is the ability...
^^^
Line 3, column 4, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...in the reading has some weakens. The first area of dispute is the ability of...
^^^
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ides to live as free swimming predator. The lecturer contends that free swimming pr...
^^^
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m catch the prey, however the angistoids were lacking these characteristics. On t...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...strong predators and active swimmers. Another controversial issue that the agn...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 210, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...calized in one area. However, angistoids were moving too fast. According to their...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g dead organism and grazing bacteria. The final point of dispute is that agnos...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 119, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'parasites'' or 'parasite's'?
Suggestion: parasites'; parasite's
... organisms. The lecture claims that the parasites population should be small or they will...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... be small or they will harm their hosts. According to the fossils of angostide th...
^^
Line 8, column 242, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he fossils of angostide there population were very large and that contradict the ...
^^
Line 8, column 305, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Yet
...hat contradict the theory of parasites. yet, the author of the reading refutes this...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1375.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24809160305 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52488661287 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522900763359 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.885310305 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6666666667 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4666666667 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.46666666667 7.06452816374 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 13.0 4.19205298013 310% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325756951374 0.272083759551 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122226564877 0.0996497079465 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563411858261 0.0662205650399 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197665809902 0.162205337803 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522211554041 0.0443174109184 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.