TPO 44-integrated
In the reading, The author provides three reasons of support for the claim that a European silver coin which explored at Maine of United State is not the original historical evidence. However, finding all the ideas questionable and implausible, the lecturer asserts that the coin is original. It brought by a European explorer whose name was Norse, to the America, so she casts doubt on each of the author reasons.
First, the passage of the reading declares that the distance between the place that Norse lived in, eastern Canada, and Maine in United State was too long so that the coin was not brought by him to the North America. Conversely, the lecturer posits that beside the coin other historical objects were discovered at Maine because the people of this area traveled to far away places. During their travel, they were interested in bringing other historical objects with themselves. Therefore, They would reach the North settlements and bring back the coin to the Maine.
Furthermore, the reading holds the view that there were not other coins in the settlement of Norse at the Canada. However, the speaker rebuts this point by explaining that Norse did have permanent dwelling in the North America. According to some points, when he traveled to the North America, he packed up all of his possession such as valuable things as well as coins. Therefore, when he turned to the Europe, he took them back.
Finally, the author mentions that silver coins which brought by Norse were useless for native Americans. On the contrary, the teacher disagrees with this claim. She states that Norse knew that these coins in attractive and beautiful for the Americans since they utilized them as necklace or jewelry. Consequently, Norse found these coins astonishing and brought them with himself.
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'consequently', 'conversely', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'as to', 'such as', 'as well as', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.246246246246 0.261695866417 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.129129129129 0.158904122519 81% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0630630630631 0.0723426182421 87% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0510510510511 0.0435111971325 117% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0540540540541 0.0277247811725 195% => OK
Prepositions: 0.141141141141 0.128828473217 110% => OK
Participles: 0.024024024024 0.0370669169778 65% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.50433838244 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.021021021021 0.0208969081088 101% => OK
Particles: 0.00900900900901 0.00154638098197 583% => OK
Determiners: 0.129129129129 0.128158765124 101% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.003003003003 0.0158828679856 19% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.021021021021 0.0114777025283 183% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1803.0 1645.83664459 110% => OK
No of words: 298.0 271.125827815 110% => OK
Chars per words: 6.05033557047 6.08160592843 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.04852973271 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.348993288591 0.374372842146 93% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.275167785235 0.287516216867 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.191275167785 0.187439937562 102% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0939597315436 0.113142543107 83% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50433838244 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536912751678 0.539623497131 99% => OK
Word variations: 54.9875770055 53.8517498576 102% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0529801325 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.8666666667 21.7502111507 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8326977904 49.3711431718 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.2 132.220823453 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 21.7502111507 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 47.3834451902 50.5018328374 94% => OK
Elegance: 1.75641025641 1.90840788429 92% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.765424614947 0.549887131256 139% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.144672476019 0.142949733639 101% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0961175152609 0.0787303798458 122% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.587454356489 0.631733273073 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.147402847967 0.139662658121 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.338701633114 0.266732575781 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.151741109232 0.103435571967 147% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.466728488424 0.414875509568 112% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.117039150979 0.0530846634433 220% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.554929580396 0.40443939384 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0864456533752 0.0528353158467 164% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.49668874172 172% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.62251655629 28% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.