The reading states that a silver coin discovered at a Native American archaelogical site was not a genuine coin and provides three reasons of support. The proessor, howevere, explains that the coin is not a fake and refutes each the author's reasons.
First, the reading claims that the Native American site is far from other sites. The professor refutes this point by stating that the great distance is not a good reason. She says that Natives may traveled to the North America. Besides, the professor mentions that they could travel back.
Second, the reading states that other coins did not found in the site. The professor contends that not founding other coins is not necessary. She says that they may come back to Europe and pack up all coins.
Third, the reading states that silver coins would most likely be useless to them. The professor refutes this point by saying that Natives was appealing to the coins because of their beauty. She also mentions that Native may interested in the coins.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, may, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 30.3222958057 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 831.0 1373.03311258 61% => OK
No of words: 171.0 270.72406181 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85964912281 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 4.04702891845 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26172945537 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 145.348785872 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 419.366225166 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.6124969497 49.2860985944 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 69.25 110.228320801 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.25 21.698381199 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41666666667 7.06452816374 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392154874794 0.272083759551 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152911494116 0.0996497079465 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111871255408 0.0662205650399 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257183512322 0.162205337803 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639336968739 0.0443174109184 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.3589403974 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 53.8541721854 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 11.0289183223 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 63.6247240618 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.2008830022 62% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.