The reading states that coins, which recently have been dicovered in native American in marine are not related to European explorers and provides three reasons of support. On the other hand, the professor refutes each author's reasons and argues that infact these coins have been brought by European explorers.
Initially, the reading says that these coins are setteled by some one who wanted to mislead people, because coins are found far a way from another documented sites, in far eastern Canada. On the contrary, the professor argues that there have been discovered lots of others artificants which were brought from eastern Canada, so coins could be brought as well. She mentions that native American could travelling far a way distance and brought back coins.
Furthermore, the reading possess that if these coins arenot irrelevant to European explorers, lots of them might have been discovered, which have not. In contrast, the professor accounts this notion by saying that enormous amount of them is not neccessarlly conveiniance reason, due to the fact that native American were not the producer of coins. In addition, she refers to the time when European returned to their village without packing all of their stuffs.
Last but not least, the reading advocates that native American did not utilize coins and did not understand its functions, hence why European explorers brought coins with theirselves. However, the professor refutes that by stating that European explorers were aware of native American economic and only brought their coins because of their beauty. She claims that explorers could sell coins as jewleries to native American.
Sentence: On the contrary, the professor argues that there have been discovered lots of others artificants which were brought from eastern Canada, so coins could be brought as well.
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, plural, common
Suggestion: Refer to others and artificants
Sentence: She mentions that native American could travelling far a way distance and brought back coins.
Description: A modal auxillary is not usually followed by a verb, present participle or gerund
Suggestion: Refer to could and travelling
the reading possess that
the reading possesses that
Sentence: The reading states that coins, which recently have been dicovered in native American in marine are not related to European explorers and provides three reasons of support.
Error: dicovered Suggestion: discovered
Sentence: On the other hand, the professor refutes each author's reasons and argues that infact these coins have been brought by European explorers.
Error: infact Suggestion: infant
Sentence: Initially, the reading says that these coins are setteled by some one who wanted to mislead people, because coins are found far a way from another documented sites, in far eastern Canada.
Error: setteled Suggestion: settled
Sentence: On the contrary, the professor argues that there have been discovered lots of others artificants which were brought from eastern Canada, so coins could be brought as well.
Error: artificants Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: Furthermore, the reading possess that if these coins arenot irrelevant to European explorers, lots of them might have been discovered, which have not.
Error: arenot Suggestion: are not
Sentence: In contrast, the professor accounts this notion by saying that enormous amount of them is not neccessarlly conveiniance reason, due to the fact that native American were not the producer of coins.
Error: neccessarlly Suggestion: necessarily
Error: conveiniance Suggestion: convenience
Sentence: Last but not least, the reading advocates that native American did not utilize coins and did not understand its functions, hence why European explorers brought coins with theirselves.
Error: theirselves Suggestion: themselves
Sentence: She claims that explorers could sell coins as jewleries to native American.
Error: jewleries Suggestion: jewelries
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 9 2
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 21 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 9 2
No. of Sentences: 11 12
No. of Words: 263 250
No. of Characters: 1360 1200
No. of Different Words: 132 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.027 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.171 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.394 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 106 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 81 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 52 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 26 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.909 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.215 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.636 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.455 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.666 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.214 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4