TPO 45
The reading states that the found structures were not created by bees and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that it is possible that the structures were made by bees and refutes each of the author's unconvincing point.
First, the reading claims that no fossil remains of bees have been found that date to 200 million years ago. The professor refutes this point by saying that it is true that there is no fossil, which date back to 200 million years ago, but it does not mean bees were not exist those days. Fossils preserve under certain condition, which one of them is sticky liquid made by trees. Such trees are very rare and it is probable that these kinds of trees did not exist 200 million years ago. So, no fossil of bees could have been preserved.
Second, the article explains that absence of flowering plants is another reason, because bees usually feed on flowering plants. However, the professor contends that those bees may feed on non-flowering plants, for example, Feren and Pine trees. When these plants evolved, bees gradually adopted to new plant.
Third, the reading averts that details of found structures is not similar to those of modern ones. The lecture apposes this point by stating that modern bees use some certain kinds of chemical to protect their nest. Analyzing of the found structures has revealed that the chemical substance of the found structures is the same as that of the modern bee nests.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
...ago, but it does not mean bees were not exist those days. Fossils preserve under cert...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, may, second, so, third, for example, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1220.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 250.0 270.72406181 92% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25411268574 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 351.9 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3490577678 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8461538462 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2307692308 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 7.06452816374 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0539919992519 0.272083759551 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0232478287953 0.0996497079465 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0185679081398 0.0662205650399 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0326954268428 0.162205337803 20% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00635868645335 0.0443174109184 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.