Both reading and listening discuss size of early animals and why there are so large. The article stated that They are so large than today’s animals because of several reasons. However, the speaker refutes each authour’s reasons and provide several explanations.
First of all, the article claims that oxygen can be one of reasons. Some scientist believe that aminals growth support with oxiygen-rich enviroment. The speaker disprove this point by saying that in early time there are much volcanic activities and these activities were resulted harmful gas. It is not hard to live in early time.
Secondly, Scientist believe that nutrition is significant for animals to enough grow. According to the article there were much food to feed animals for all species and these can lead large body. The speaker agree that supply food is important but he disagree that some relics show that there not enough food for all species.
Lastly,The article states that large size might be stimulated by climate condition in the past. Animals need to stay warm and they consume much energy to stay warm. According to the article they are big because they do not consume much energy to warm. The speaker oppose this point by saying that Warm climate is not enable for large animals they can not live in warm climate. Animals need to cool off as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'believes'.
Suggestion: believes
...n can be one of reasons. Some scientist believe that aminals growth support with oxiyge...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 162, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'disproves'.
Suggestion: disproves
...th oxiygen-rich enviroment. The speaker disprove this point by saying that in early time...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 21, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Scientist) must be used with a third-person verb: 'believes'.
Suggestion: believes
...e in early time. Secondly, Scientist believe that nutrition is significant for anima...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'agrees'.
Suggestion: agrees
... these can lead large body. The speaker agree that supply food is important but he di...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 251, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'disagrees'.
Suggestion: disagrees
...ee that supply food is important but he disagree that some relics show that there not en...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 7, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , The
...t enough food for all species. Lastly,The article states that large size might be...
^^^^
Line 7, column 265, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'opposes'.
Suggestion: opposes
...onsume much energy to warm. The speaker oppose this point by saying that Warm climate ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 318, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'enabled'.
Suggestion: enabled
...oint by saying that Warm climate is not enable for large animals they can not live in ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, well, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1128.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 225.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01333333333 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.391152416 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 145.348785872 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511111111111 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 351.9 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5103748235 49.2860985944 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.2 110.228320801 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 21.698381199 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86666666667 7.06452816374 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400940603368 0.272083759551 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129786181708 0.0996497079465 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06189100529 0.0662205650399 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222706549168 0.162205337803 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539566550442 0.0443174109184 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.