TPO 46
The article states that there are some efforts in the United States to stimulate doctors to accept the change from traditionally medical recorded data to electronic form and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor claims that it would not be beneficial and casts doubt on each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading posits that utilization of electronic records can lead to decline in costs by storing money and transferring medical records. The professor refutes this point by explaining that doctors would keep paper records as a backup. So, they still should pay costs.
Second, in the article it is asserted that electronic records are indispensable in diminishing medical errors. However, doctors will use papers when they are examining patients, the professor says. We also learn that the staff will enter those records, which are written by the doctors, into the computer, after they interpreted those records of doctors. Therefore, there is a huge chance of error.
Third, the reading says that those electronic records can wonderfully help medical research by making it possible to assemble large proportions of data. The professor opposes this point by saying that due to the strict privacy laws of the government it would be difficult to collect data electronically. According to the professor, there will be some permissions obstructing this process, including patients' permission.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The article states that there are some e...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... doubt on each of the authors reasons. First, the reading posits that utilizati...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ckup. So, they still should pay costs. Second, in the article it is asserted th...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fore, there is a huge chance of error. Third, the reading says that those elect...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'third']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.246963562753 0.261695866417 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.178137651822 0.158904122519 112% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0647773279352 0.0723426182421 90% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0404858299595 0.0435111971325 93% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0323886639676 0.0277247811725 117% => OK
Prepositions: 0.117408906883 0.128828473217 91% => OK
Participles: 0.0526315789474 0.0370669169778 142% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.78809543934 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0323886639676 0.0208969081088 155% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.113360323887 0.128158765124 88% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0364372469636 0.0158828679856 229% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0080971659919 0.0114777025283 71% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1438.0 1645.83664459 87% => OK
No of words: 222.0 271.125827815 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.47747747748 6.08160592843 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.04852973271 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.423423423423 0.374372842146 113% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.346846846847 0.287516216867 121% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.216216216216 0.187439937562 115% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.144144144144 0.113142543107 127% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78809543934 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594594594595 0.539623497131 110% => OK
Word variations: 58.805972255 53.8517498576 109% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0529801325 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.5 21.7502111507 85% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2639588329 49.3711431718 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.833333333 132.220823453 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 21.7502111507 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.75 0.878197800319 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.39072847682 118% => OK
Readability: 53.1846846847 50.5018328374 105% => OK
Elegance: 1.66129032258 1.90840788429 87% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.612986434563 0.549887131256 111% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0999247181055 0.142949733639 70% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.078747781974 0.0787303798458 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.572657695664 0.631733273073 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.174118928462 0.139662658121 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.249924444982 0.266732575781 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142439554372 0.103435571967 138% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.288282128679 0.414875509568 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0285190451876 0.0530846634433 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.42358961366 0.40443939384 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282063155894 0.0528353158467 53% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.26048565121 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 10.2958057395 78% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.