tpo-47
The reading and the lecture both talk about pterosaurs, and about that they could flight or not. The author suggests that they could not fly because of three reasons; however, the professor states that the arguments are not strong enough.
At first, they discuss cold-blood. The reading claims that pterosaurs were probably cold-blooded and they had a slow metabolism. As a result they could not produce a lot of energy for flight. The speaker, on the other hand, says that pterosaurs had a hair covering which covered them in low temperature, and made them like warm-blooded creatures.
Secondly, the reading and the lecture talk about the weight of pterosaurs. The writer argues that pterosaurs, because of their heavy weight, can not flight. In contrast, the professor states that pterosaurs were hollow; consequently, they were not too heavy and they would have been able to flight.
Finally, the article and speech discuss the power of take off. The reading suggests that all flyer animals should take off from ground and then fly like birds. For this ability they should have strong legs. But pterosaurs did not have strong back legs muscles. Nevertheless, the lecturer says that pterosaurs used their four legs for walking. So they could run as fast enough and jump.
All in all, the reading claims that pterosaurs were not able to fly. However, the professor says that the reasons mentioned in the passage are nor persuasive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: HEAVY_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'heavyweight'?
Suggestion: heavyweight
...rgues that pterosaurs, because of their heavy weight, can not flight. In contrast, the profe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, however, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, in contrast, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1202.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 238.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05042016807 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51548414345 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521008403361 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1189654918 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.7058823529 110.228320801 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0 21.698381199 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58823529412 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383125808477 0.272083759551 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120299309784 0.0996497079465 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0828244032109 0.0662205650399 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201418084859 0.162205337803 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0887909675735 0.0443174109184 200% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.3589403974 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 53.8541721854 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 11.0289183223 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.42419426049 86% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 63.6247240618 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.2008830022 62% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.