Tpo 48
The author states that there are three methods help to reduce the population decline of the frog which in turn affect human, and he provides three reasons for support. However, the professor asserts that the three methods mentioned are unpractical and do not offer a solution for the decline of the frog population.
First, the reading claims that creating a law that prohibits the farmer from using pesticides near the sensitive frog population will help to solve the problem. The lecture contradicts this point by saying that the solution to reduce the pesticides in agriculture areas is fair and economically unpractical. In fact, if the farmer follows these strict laws, they will suffer from sever disadvantageous compared to other farmers such as a decrease in their crops and yields.
Second, the article points out that using the antifungal medication to kill the fungus that hurt the frog by dehydrating them is a second method to reduce the frog's decline. However, the professor explains that fungal treatment should be applied individually to each frog. Indeed, this method needs to treat and capture each frog separately. Moreover, this strategy will not prevent the disease of their offspring, the new generation also needs to apply the medication to them. Therefore, antifungal medicines will be a complicated and expensive method.
Third, the reading asserts that protect the lakes and marshes from the human activities to protect the frog population from threatened. The professor counters this idea by telling that the protection will not save the frog. He demonstrates that there is another factor responsible for the threatening of the frog population which is the global warming that threatens the wetland habitats. So, the prevention of human activities is unlikely to help the frog population from decline.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
the reading asserts that protect the lakes and marshes from the human activities to protect the frog population from threatened
the reading asserts that protecting the lakes and marshes from the human activities is another method to protect the frog population from threatened
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 25 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 12
No. of Words: 292 250
No. of Characters: 1508 1200
No. of Different Words: 148 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.134 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.164 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.705 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 111 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 85 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 55 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 43 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.857 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.479 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.643 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.359 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.581 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.117 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, third, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.01324503311 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 292.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29452054795 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7679962681 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520547945205 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1301502225 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.428571429 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.443433436442 0.272083759551 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15666100921 0.0996497079465 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845974955623 0.0662205650399 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260710768889 0.162205337803 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581725079383 0.0443174109184 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.3589403974 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.7273730684 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.