In the lecture, the professor explains the disadvantages of each of the three solutions to save the declining frog populations around the globe.
To begin with, the passage claims that banning farmers near vulnerable frog habitats from using pesticides can dramatically reduce the harm caused by them. Nonetheless, the speaker refutes this and argues that this policy is not fair for some certain farmers, because it diminishes the product of crops and makes those farmers less competitive to their counterparts.
Next, contrary to the second method in the reading passage that large-scale deployment of the new antifungal treatment can protect frogs from getting infected by the fatal pathogens, the lecturer points out that the frogs have to be treated individually, which makes the goal impractical to be achieved. What is more, the next generations of frogs are not immune to the fungus, so the operation must be carried out repeatedly.
Finally, the instructor rules out the possibility of restricting water use to preserve the habitats of frogs. It is the effect of global warming but not the over-consumption of water, as asserted by the professor, that causes damages to water system and wetlands, endangering the frog species. Hence, controlling water usage would contribute little to the restoration of frog populations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 72, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ut the possibility of restricting water use to preserve the habitats of frogs. It i...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, hence, if, nonetheless, second, so, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1130.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 210.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38095238095 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99680858214 2.5805825403 116% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.633333333333 0.540411800872 117% => OK
syllable_count: 345.6 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.2060123722 49.2860985944 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.25 110.228320801 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 21.698381199 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 7.06452816374 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.434397000894 0.272083759551 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165106257714 0.0996497079465 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656741996792 0.0662205650399 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220160376371 0.162205337803 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360645417835 0.0443174109184 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.3589403974 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.42419426049 122% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.7273730684 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.