Both Reading and Listening discuss migration abilities of Humpback whales. The article states that humpback whales migrates navigating by star and provide several evidence such as their intelligent, movement and exhibiting unusual behavior. However, the speaker explain that evidences are not convincing and refutes each author’s reasons.
First of all, the article claims that whales are so smart to navigate by stars. Whales brains shows that whales are intelligent. This features seperates whales from the other animals. But, the speaker disprove this point by saying that not only whales use stars to navigate but also birds such as ducks use it. Ducks are not ingelligent animals. It has nothing do with it.
Seconly, the article posits that whales maintaining movement in staight direction so that they can travel long distance. They use langmarks to stay right direction. However, the speaker disagree that and add it has diferent explanation. According to the speaker, whales use world’s magnatic field to travel.
Lastly, unusual behavior, such as spy-hopping which is very rare among marine animals, are shown by whales such as looking up to upward out of water . The speaker opposite this point by saying that sharks also exhibits these behavior. They are not unusual. These are just speculations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[8]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun evidence seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'some evidence'.
Suggestion: some evidence
...migrates navigating by star and provide several evidence such as their intelligent, movement and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...uch as looking up to upward out of water . The speaker opposite this point by sayi...
^^
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this behavior' or 'these behaviors'?
Suggestion: this behavior; these behaviors
...int by saying that sharks also exhibits these behavior. They are not unusual. These are just s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, lastly, look, so, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1123.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 206.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45145631068 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64624964199 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606796116505 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 340.2 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 21.2450331126 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.3876491772 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 66.0588235294 110.228320801 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.1176470588 21.698381199 56% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.11764705882 7.06452816374 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.27373068433 257% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373922026337 0.272083759551 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10910148513 0.0996497079465 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775148370305 0.0662205650399 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214067122286 0.162205337803 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283669164516 0.0443174109184 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 53.8541721854 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.2 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.44 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.498013245 65% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.2008830022 62% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.