tpo 49 - writing 1
How animals are able to migarate long distances is still unknown for scientists. The author believes a specific kind of animal, humpback whales, migrate by the help of the stars in the sky and asserts three reasons. However, the Lecturer cast doubts all reasons.
First, in contrast to the author idea that cognitive skills and intelligence have a correlation to each other, the lecturer thinks differently. The lecturer says there is no connection between them and elaborate this by explaining an example. Docks are considered as animals who have an average cognitive ability, while they are not intelligent. Those cognitive skills are somehow instinct. So the idea of using stars just because of being intelligent does not make sense.
Secondly, the lecturer rejects what is says in reading about the need of sending external object or forces for orienting in a straight direction. Also, he asserts humpback whales have some sort of biomagnetic ability in their mind help them to find their directions to migrate in a straight way.
Finally, sharks are an exceptional example of animals who do spy-hopping but do not migrate in a straight line. Sharks just pursue their prey and go wherever they can haunt. Therefore, the professor claims the use of spy-hopping as a reason is a pure speculation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: HELP_TO_FIND[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'help them find' instead.
Suggestion: help them find
...rt of biomagnetic ability in their mind help them to find their directions to migrate in a straig...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 278, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a straight way" with adverb for "straight"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...hem to find their directions to migrate in a straight way. Finally, sharks are an exceptional ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, in contrast, kind of, sort of, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1094.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 214.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11214953271 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78121796657 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61214953271 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 340.2 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0743926213 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.1538461538 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4615384615 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 7.06452816374 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2892320338 0.272083759551 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793920297248 0.0996497079465 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527869582884 0.0662205650399 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152348324199 0.162205337803 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516430823965 0.0443174109184 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.