TPO INTEGRATD 48
The reading argues that the are three methods to prevent the decline of the frogs population. However the lecture disagrees. It claims that all the methods mentioned in the passage have some problems.
The first point of dispute is the use of pesticides. The lecture claims that prohibit pesticides is not economical or practical method. Farmers are competitor in the market for having better crops and higher yield by using pesticides some farmer will be in sever danger, and they losing their crops and getting lower field. However, the reading argues that pesticides is the main cause for decline the frogs population which lead to sever breathing problems.
Another controversial issue is use of anti fungal treatment. The lecture asserts that the treatment is complex. Each frog needs to be treated invdiually. The treatment will not prevent the disease from pass on to the off spring. But, the reading contends this point by saying that the fungus cause thicken to the frog's skins and lead to dehydration of the frogs.
The final issue of depute is protecting the lakes and marches. The lecture says that global warming is the main cause declining in the frog's population and other species recent the last century. Yet, the reading argues that human over use of water and damaging of the frog habitats is the main cause in the decline.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'frogs'' or 'frog's'?
Suggestion: frogs'; frog's
...e methods to prevent the decline of the frogs population. However the lecture disagre...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...nt the decline of the frogs population. However the lecture disagrees. It claims that a...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed in the passage have some problems. The first point of dispute is the use of...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...will be in sever danger, and they losing their crops and getting lower field. Ho...
^^
Line 4, column 312, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and they losing their crops and getting lower field. However, the reading argues...
^^
Line 4, column 405, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'frogs'' or 'frog's'?
Suggestion: frogs'; frog's
...cides is the main cause for decline the frogs population which lead to sever breathin...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hich lead to sever breathing problems. Another controversial issue is use of an...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and lead to dehydration of the frogs. The final issue of depute is protecting ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is the main cause declining in the frogs population and other species recent the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1147.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 231.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96536796537 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4697946644 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519480519481 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 334.8 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.3209955775 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.4666666667 110.228320801 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.53333333333 7.06452816374 22% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406045286873 0.272083759551 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116055630084 0.0996497079465 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0877032789793 0.0662205650399 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236111496063 0.162205337803 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553893706796 0.0443174109184 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 53.8541721854 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.0289183223 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.2008830022 62% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.