The article states three ways to address the decline of Torreya that are proposed by experts. However, the professor in the lecture casts doubt on these ways and refutes them by considering a couple of points.
First off, the passage holds the idea that reestablishing Torreya in northern Florida with cool and wet microclimate in which it thrived for many years is helpful. The professor opposes this point due to the fact that this area has a microclimate that is a part of a bigger climate. This big area becomes dry because of the high temperature which is the result of climate change. So, it can affect northern Florida, and the condition of growing for Torreya, too.
Furthermore, the article asserts that moving Torreya to a different location, far from its microclimate is another option. On the other hand, the professor refutes this idea by giving an example of moving Black Locus as a plant that moved to North for preserving. This experience shows that moving this plant to another place made conditions difficult for other local plants and trees that were in danger of extinction and finally, killed them. So, this change may have some unpredictable outcomes.
Finally, the reading states that one way could be preserving Torreya in research centers. The professor explains that this idea is highly questionable. He brings the fact that plants can just resist diseases when they are in a place where other plants exist. They need diversity for surviving. Due to the fact that capacity of research centers are limited for preserving lots of plants and trees, the specific plants like Torreya are not capable to survive in long term there.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 381, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
... which is the result of climate change. so, it can affect northen Florida, and the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97122302158 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58562792499 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564748201439 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.5955657577 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1333333333 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5333333333 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.93333333333 7.06452816374 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376381237586 0.272083759551 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120290661316 0.0996497079465 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837481399939 0.0662205650399 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210750019428 0.162205337803 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629202569529 0.0443174109184 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.