Tpo32
In this set of materials, the reading states there were being heard bizarre sounds in North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean that from 1960s to 1980s by the sailors in Russian submarines. The submarines' sonar (a approach of discerning objects in underwater) could not detect these sounds. The reading brings up three theories for the strange sounds, however the lecture finds all theories dubious and provide some evidences to refute them. The information the professor provides contradict with the fact outlined in the reading passage.
First, the reading declares that the odd noises may have created by male and female orca whales in a courtship ritual to attract a male or female, in contrast the professor argues that this theory is unlikely because the orca whales live in near surface not in deep parts and also they are discernible by sonar.
Second, the author of reading contends that this sound would have produced by giant squids which live in the deep part of ocean. Since they have a soft body without skeleton; hence sonar is not able to detect them, on the contrary the lecture rejects this idea too and expresses that these giant squids have being lived for a long time in this Ocean and the sounds continued just two decades not more.
Third, the reading proposes that the sounds may have been from the foreign submarines which they were working secretly and were not being registered by the sonar, conversely the lecture believes that the direction of sound were altering faster and faster, hence foreign submarines’ engine noise could have detected by sonar. Nowadays, despite of the existence of technology, we do not have such a submarine that move faster and at the same time it does not produce sound.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 25 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 12
No. of Words: 291 250
No. of Characters: 1401 1200
No. of Different Words: 155 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.13 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.814 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.263 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 98 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 71 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 41 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 22 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 32.333 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 15.07 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.556 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.404 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.497 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.178 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'submarines'' or 'submarine's'?
Suggestion: submarines'; submarine's
... the sailors in Russian submarines. The submarines sonar a approach of discerning objects ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ussian submarines. The submarines sonar a approach of discerning objects in under...
^
Line 1, column 432, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... provide some evidences to refute them. The information the professor provides cont...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'conversely', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'in contrast', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.250793650794 0.261695866417 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.165079365079 0.158904122519 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0730158730159 0.0723426182421 101% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0571428571429 0.0435111971325 131% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0222222222222 0.0277247811725 80% => OK
Prepositions: 0.133333333333 0.128828473217 103% => OK
Participles: 0.047619047619 0.0370669169778 128% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.39019679226 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0126984126984 0.0208969081088 61% => OK
Particles: 0.0031746031746 0.00154638098197 205% => OK
Determiners: 0.133333333333 0.128158765124 104% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.015873015873 0.0158828679856 100% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00952380952381 0.0114777025283 83% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1727.0 1645.83664459 105% => OK
No of words: 291.0 271.125827815 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.93470790378 6.08160592843 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.04852973271 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.360824742268 0.374372842146 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.26116838488 0.287516216867 91% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.144329896907 0.187439937562 77% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0824742268041 0.113142543107 73% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39019679226 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560137457045 0.539623497131 104% => OK
Word variations: 58.3256934877 53.8517498576 108% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0529801325 69% => OK
Sentence length: 32.3333333333 21.7502111507 149% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.0674387519 49.3711431718 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 191.888888889 132.220823453 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.3333333333 21.7502111507 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.22222222222 0.878197800319 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.39072847682 88% => OK
Readability: 58.4501718213 50.5018328374 116% => OK
Elegance: 1.76623376623 1.90840788429 93% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.753977576521 0.549887131256 137% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.179730966646 0.142949733639 126% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0544932727726 0.0787303798458 69% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.722541235629 0.631733273073 114% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.148364149364 0.139662658121 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.41499553108 0.266732575781 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809028537906 0.103435571967 78% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.393117646328 0.414875509568 95% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0265663761429 0.0530846634433 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.54620476928 0.40443939384 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668835074319 0.0528353158467 127% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 0.0 3.49668874172 0% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.