TPO35
In the reading section, the writer contends that several theories have been proposed to explain the origin of the Voynich manuscript which a bookseller named Wilfrid M.Voynich acquired; However, in the lecture, the professor completely refutes all the reading points by presenting some reasons and examples.
First of all, the writer claims that Athony Ascham has been identified as a possible author of the manuscript since some illustration in the manuscript are similar to his books; on the other hand, the professor rejects this notion by stating that it is unlikely that the manuscript had been written by this author since never had he written about magical topics since he was a physician and botanist.
Moreover, the writer also states that the manuscript is really a fake and its texts has no real meaning; in contrast, the lecture again takes issue with this statement and states that it is impossible that Kelley have created the manuscript as a fake magical book to sell to a wealthy noble since it required monumental amount of time to complete.
In addition, the writer also indicates that the manuscript is actually a modern fake created by Voynich himself; in contrast, the lecture material is against this statement and express that thanks to modern technology, it has been revealed that the ink which has been used in the manuscript had been created centuries before he found the book.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eading section, the writer contends that several theories have been proposed to e...
^^
Line 2, column 170, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Voynich
...ript which a bookseller named Wilfrid M.Voynich acquired; However, in the lecture, the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pt had been written by this author since never had he written about magical topic...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, however, if, moreover, really, so, in addition, in contrast, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1182.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 233.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07296137339 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60484969737 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515021459227 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 361.8 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 13.0662251656 31% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 58.0 21.2450331126 273% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.2518796461 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 295.5 110.228320801 268% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 58.25 21.698381199 268% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 28.75 7.06452816374 407% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 31.6 13.3589403974 237% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 12.61 53.8541721854 23% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 25.9 11.0289183223 235% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.01 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.44 8.42419426049 124% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 27.5 10.7273730684 256% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 25.2 10.498013245 240% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 26.0 11.2008830022 232% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.