tpo36
Both the reading and lecture are about cloud seeding which is a specific and chemical approach. In this method, researchers attempt to become hail to snow or rain with the help of a chemical reaction- spraying silver iodide on storm clouds- to reduce the crop damages in the farming regions. The reading provides three reasons in supporting this idea. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article and finds all of arguments dubious.
First of all, the author of reading declares that scholars tested this approach in laboratory atmosphere and they could become cold water vapor ( is called hail) to snow and rain with adding silver iodide. This point is challenged by the professor. She points out that it may be true only in the laboratory ambient; however, in the real life, this chemical reaction is unpredictable and it may cause drought; consequently the condition will get worse for crops.
Secondly, the article contends that this experiment has been reported as a prosperous way from some countries like Asia and they would have controlled precipitation efficiently; in the contrast, the lecturer believes that successful obtained results in Asia cannot guarantee that this prosperity can repeat in The United State. She elaborates on this by mentioning that these experiments have done in the big cities, so since there is the air pollution in the big cities, so the mentioned chemical reaction can combine with the particles of pollution and create a logical result; however, the cloud seeding in the farming areas and out of cities cannot be a secure method.
Finally, the reading passage states that there is some local evidence from being appropriate the cloud seeding approach and the local farmers could reduce the crop damages due to hail. This argument is rebutted by the professor. She expresses that aforementioned evidence is related to the areas of west, east, north and it may have been a natural phenomenon in reduction of hail in a specific time of year and not the successful of cloud seeding.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e and they could become cold water vapor is called hail to snow and rain with add...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 338.0 270.72406181 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04437869822 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65300825202 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 145.348785872 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529585798817 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 98.7800587163 49.2860985944 200% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 142.083333333 110.228320801 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1666666667 21.698381199 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06452816374 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.3589403974 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 53.8541721854 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 63.6247240618 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.