TPO43
The reading states that Agnostids were a group of marine animal, which became extinct, and provides three theories about the their possible original lives. However, the professor explains that all three theories have sever weakness and opposes each of the author's points.
First, the article averts that the agnostides may have been free-swimming predator that hunted smaller animals. However, the professor contends that it is unlikely because swimming predators usually have large and developed eyes, but The Agonstids had tiny eyes and were almost blind.
Second, the reading explains that they may have been lived on the seafloor. The professor refutes this point by saying that It seafloor dwellers mostly are not capable of moving fast and, as a result, occupy small areas. Even though, Agnostids spread on large areas and used to move fast from on area to another.
Third, the author claims that may Agnostids were parasites. The lecture opposes this point by stating that parasites do not live on very large population, and kill off the host. Despite parasited, Agnostids lived in very large population, which is ruled out of parasites.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...inct, and provides three theories about the their possible original lives. However, the p...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 31, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her. Third, the author claims that may Agnostids were parasites. The lectur...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, may, second, so, third, well, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 972.0 1373.03311258 71% => OK
No of words: 184.0 270.72406181 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28260869565 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 4.04702891845 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38672981421 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.630434782609 0.540411800872 117% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 419.366225166 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7136470884 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381552537409 0.272083759551 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156221760545 0.0996497079465 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.093777614502 0.0662205650399 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216122741823 0.162205337803 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287175344988 0.0443174109184 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.