TPO44
In the reading passage the writer contends that there are several reasons that an age-old European silver coin discovered in the state of Maine is not genuine historical evidence but a historical fake; however, in the lecture, the professor completely refutes all the reading points by presenting several reasons and examples.
First of all, the writer claims that the great distance between the Maine site and European explores settlements known as the Norse, suggests that the coin has no real connection with the settlements; on the other hand, the professor rejects this notion by stating that many other objects founded there came from far distance inasmuch as native American were interested to unusual objects.
Moreover, the writer also maintains that no other coins have been found at the sites that were inhabited by the Norse; in contrast, the professor again takes issues with this statement and explains that no other coins in the place cannot reject the possibility of the presence of the coins. She is of the opinion that it is possible that they took back all the coins to the European with themselves when they moved back.
In addition, the writer also manifests that silver coins may have been useless to the native American; on the contrary, the lecture again is against this statement and states that the native who were interested in unusual objects could have used them for making jewelry or necklaces.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, in addition, in contrast, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1200.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 236.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08474576271 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43199668406 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555084745763 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 371.7 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 13.0662251656 38% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 47.0 21.2450331126 221% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.8477722483 49.2860985944 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 240.0 110.228320801 218% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 47.2 21.698381199 218% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 24.8 7.06452816374 351% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.444899549238 0.272083759551 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.229269474807 0.0996497079465 230% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0861985922753 0.0662205650399 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257243649412 0.162205337803 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676236765223 0.0443174109184 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 26.1 13.3589403974 195% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.8541721854 44% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 21.6 11.0289183223 196% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.07 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 27.5 10.7273730684 256% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 20.8 10.498013245 198% => OK
text_standard: 28.0 11.2008830022 250% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.