TPO46
In the reading passage, the writer contends that storing patients' medical records in electronic databases has several advantages over traditional paper-based record keeping; however, in the lecture, the professor completely refutes all the reading points by presenting some reasons and examples.
First of all, the writer takes the view that the use of electronic records can help reduce costs by saving money on storing and transferring medical records; on the other hand, the lecture rejects this notion by stating that doctors have to keep paper records as back up. In addition, doctors have to sign prescribes, so they have to use paper.
Moreover, the writer also claims that the medical record systems can preventing errors; conversely, the professor again is against this statement and declares that errors would not be reduced since an office staff of doctor has to interpret information which the doctor has written on paper and after that enters them to the computer; therefor, human errors would not be reduced.
In addition, the writer also indicates that the electronic medical records can greatly aid medical research by making it possible to gather large amount of data from patients' records; in contrast, the professor again takes issue with this point of view by stating that accessing to medical records is subject to privacy; hence, researchers have to still obtain a lot of permission, patients' permission included, in order to access to the information.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, hence, however, moreover, so, still, as to, in addition, in contrast, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1251.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 235.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32340425532 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63175578734 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570212765957 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 13.0662251656 38% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 47.0 21.2450331126 221% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 127.572097263 49.2860985944 259% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 250.2 110.228320801 227% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 47.0 21.698381199 217% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 25.2 7.06452816374 357% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.598225500864 0.272083759551 220% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.306338342028 0.0996497079465 307% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121103000257 0.0662205650399 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.351173696937 0.162205337803 216% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674920398752 0.0443174109184 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 27.1 13.3589403974 203% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.8541721854 44% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 21.6 11.0289183223 196% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.46 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.27 8.42419426049 122% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.7273730684 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 20.8 10.498013245 198% => OK
text_standard: 22.0 11.2008830022 196% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.