Tpo47
In this set of material, the reading states that the pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs and they had a long wingspan, however the reading brings three reasons that they could have not flight and then support them, but the professor finds all reasons dubious and provides some evidences to advocate this idea that the pterosaurs were flying. In fact the information the lecture provides contradicts the fact outlined in the reading passage.
First, the reading declares that the pterosaurs may have been cold-blooded like other modern reptiles, and since cold-blooded animals do not have high metabolism, so the pterosaurs did not have enough energy for flying, in contrast the professor claims that the pterosaurs had a dance hair covering like fur. Such a covering usually finds in warm-blooded animals, because they need to be warm in cold climate. As a result the pterosaurs were warm-blooded and they had enough energy for flying due to their high metabolism.
Second, the reading proposes that this reptile had high weight, so its wings was not able to tolerate its weight, in the contrary the lecture argues that despite of large body, the pterosaurs had a light weight. In fact their bones were hollow; consequently they did not have such a high weight.
Third, the author of reading contends that the animals that can fly like birds need to jump from their legs or run to obtain speed, however the pterosaurs must have had powerful muscles. Analyzing their bone revealed that their hind legs were small and weak to allow the pterosaurs to run fast, conversely the lecture expresses that there a big different between the pterosaurs and birds. The birds usually walk on ground with their hind legs, however the pterosaurs had four legs and they were using all of these legs for walking on the ground like some modern animals as bats, so they could gain speed for running and then flying.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
however the reading brings three reasons that they could have not flight and then support them,
Description: 'them' , 'they' refers to what? Be sensitive to use pronouns.
flaws:
No. of Words: 328 250
Write the essay in 20 minutes. Need to remove some content from reading.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 24 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 12
No. of Words: 328 250
No. of Characters: 1588 1200
No. of Different Words: 154 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.256 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.841 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.386 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 106 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 79 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 47 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 29 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 32.8 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 15.936 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.9 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.447 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.688 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.118 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...set of material, the reading states that the pterosaurs were an ancient group of ...
^^
Line 1, column 366, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ome evidences to advocate this idea that the pterosaurs were flying. In fact the ...
^^
Line 5, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cture argues that despite of large body, the pterosaurs had a light weight. In fa...
^^
Line 5, column 200, Rule ID: LIGHT_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lightweight'?
Suggestion: lightweight
...te of large body, the pterosaurs had a light weight. In fact their bones were hollow; conse...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 363, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...esses that there a big different between the pterosaurs and birds. The birds usua...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'consequently', 'conversely', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'third', 'in contrast', 'in fact', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.227528089888 0.261695866417 87% => OK
Verbs: 0.182584269663 0.158904122519 115% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0870786516854 0.0723426182421 120% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0421348314607 0.0435111971325 97% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0449438202247 0.0277247811725 162% => OK
Prepositions: 0.126404494382 0.128828473217 98% => OK
Participles: 0.0393258426966 0.0370669169778 106% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.44465812765 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0224719101124 0.0208969081088 108% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.126404494382 0.128158765124 99% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0140449438202 0.0158828679856 88% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00561797752809 0.0114777025283 49% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1958.0 1645.83664459 119% => OK
No of words: 328.0 271.125827815 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.96951219512 6.08160592843 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.04852973271 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.335365853659 0.374372842146 90% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.268292682927 0.287516216867 93% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.155487804878 0.187439937562 83% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0975609756098 0.113142543107 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44465812765 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484756097561 0.539623497131 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 49.1848770989 53.8517498576 91% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0529801325 77% => OK
Sentence length: 32.8 21.7502111507 151% => OK
Sentence length SD: 96.5121753977 49.3711431718 195% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 195.8 132.220823453 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.8 21.7502111507 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.4 0.878197800319 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 3.39072847682 147% => OK
Readability: 59.6292682927 50.5018328374 118% => OK
Elegance: 1.45833333333 1.90840788429 76% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.563137356436 0.549887131256 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.199267653503 0.142949733639 139% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0688625714167 0.0787303798458 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.685446410795 0.631733273073 109% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.157119479842 0.139662658121 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.286328166768 0.266732575781 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109293655673 0.103435571967 106% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.347150188211 0.414875509568 84% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0514391211686 0.0530846634433 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.400146062892 0.40443939384 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0724623873022 0.0528353158467 137% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 3.1766004415 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 7.0 10.2958057395 68% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.