two approaches of personality building are compared
The lecture that followed the passage contradicts the passage.
Firstly, the speaker suggests that the conflict approach is not the only approach that play a vital role in development of human personality by bring in from the approach based on "fulfillment".
Secondly, the speaker describes the factors that influence the fulfillment approach. One main factor is presence of a strong force in oneself called "Satisfaction" apart from will to work. This is even considered to be the only factor that plays a crucial role in this approach. This factor is absent and besides the factors that are present are not prominent in the distinguishing the personality of person's in conflict approach suggested in the passage.
Thirdly, the speaker describes the way one's personality is built in this approach. And this method goes as follows. In our daily life we perform many tasks. The same manner a coin has two sides, the results of the tasks have also two types. They are: victory and failure. In this approach the personality of a person develops in such a way how he receives these results and how he envisages his way of life based on this.
All in all, the lecture's approach is more pervasive. And is more pragmatic approach rather than the approach suggested by the passage where the difference between personalities cannot be easily distinguished by just contrasting his behaviour in conflicts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...describes the factors that influence the fulfillment approach. One main factor is...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'besides', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'third', 'thirdly', 'apart from', 'in fact']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.25 0.261695866417 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.148550724638 0.158904122519 93% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0615942028986 0.0723426182421 85% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0507246376812 0.0435111971325 117% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0253623188406 0.0277247811725 91% => OK
Prepositions: 0.108695652174 0.128828473217 84% => OK
Participles: 0.036231884058 0.0370669169778 98% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.37652902521 2.5805825403 131% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00724637681159 0.0208969081088 35% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.148550724638 0.128158765124 116% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00724637681159 0.0158828679856 46% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0289855072464 0.0114777025283 253% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1443.0 1645.83664459 88% => OK
No of words: 231.0 271.125827815 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.24675324675 6.08160592843 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04852973271 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.372294372294 0.374372842146 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.307359307359 0.287516216867 107% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.233766233766 0.187439937562 125% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.142857142857 0.113142543107 126% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37652902521 2.5805825403 131% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532467532468 0.539623497131 99% => OK
Word variations: 49.6698467373 53.8517498576 92% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0529801325 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.5 21.7502111507 76% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4360805514 49.3711431718 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.071428571 132.220823453 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 21.7502111507 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.857142857143 0.878197800319 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 47.2359307359 50.5018328374 94% => OK
Elegance: 1.75806451613 1.90840788429 92% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0913250191125 0.549887131256 17% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.133686267372 0.142949733639 94% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.123272954262 0.0787303798458 157% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.590315319601 0.631733273073 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.256218949336 0.139662658121 183% => Sentences are changing often in a paragraphs.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0432781734002 0.266732575781 16% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496289069369 0.103435571967 48% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.406883820596 0.414875509568 98% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.124557069451 0.0530846634433 235% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.055658164474 0.40443939384 14% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542049845699 0.0528353158467 103% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.26048565121 164% => OK
Positive topic words: 0.0 3.49668874172 0% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 3.1766004415 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 2.0 10.2958057395 19% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.