ummarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how the proposal discussed in the lecture would solve the specific challenges described in the reading passage.
The article states that as though life on mars or the moon is possible for human being it is impossible to maintain a human presence on Venus and provides three reasons of support. However the professor refutes this idea by saying that as challenging life on Venus could be it is actually quite possible and challenges each of the reasons mentioned in the article
First, the author says that because of Venus's high atmospheric pressure, the in habitation of this planet is impossible however the lectures claims that it is true that atmospheric pressure on Venus is high but if a station is installed about kilometers above the surface atmospheric pressure would be highly reduced and it could even be equal to that on the earth's surface and there for there will be no danger threatening the station.
Second, in the article we learn that Venus lacks reservoirs of water and oxygen .However the professor clearly states that because of the chemical compounds in the Venusian atmosphere water can be reproduced using these substances and there for no need to import it
Third, the reading claims that Venus is a planet with very little sunlight because of the presence of clouds but the professor opposes this idea by explaining that above the surface these clouds are not thick enough and can let the sunlight through we also learn that they have the ability to reflect sunlight and thus humans can collect both the infiltrated and reflected sunlight to produce electricity and therefore making life on Venus possible
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... and provides three reasons of support. However the professor refutes this idea by sayi...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nus lacks reservoirs of water and oxygen .However the professor clearly states tha...
^^
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...s lacks reservoirs of water and oxygen .However the professor clearly states that becau...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...s lacks reservoirs of water and oxygen .However the professor clearly states that becau...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 109, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nlight because of the presence of clouds but the professor opposes this idea by e...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, thus, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1267.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 257.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92996108949 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54253286027 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501945525292 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 398.7 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 3.0 13.0662251656 23% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 85.0 21.2450331126 400% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 233.359998476 49.2860985944 473% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 422.333333333 110.228320801 383% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 85.6666666667 21.698381199 395% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 29.0 7.06452816374 411% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0854292694079 0.272083759551 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549706560731 0.0996497079465 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0346181192083 0.0662205650399 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0497408963973 0.162205337803 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024360530883 0.0443174109184 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 44.6 13.3589403974 334% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -14.8 53.8541721854 -27% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 5.55761589404 234% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 36.4 11.0289183223 330% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.5 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.05 8.42419426049 131% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 28.0 10.7273730684 261% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 36.0 10.498013245 343% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.