In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their employees the option of working a four-day workweek for four-fifths (80 percent)of their normal pay would benefit the economy as a whole as well as the individual companies and the employees who decided to take the option. The shortened workweek would increase company profits because employees would feel more rested and alert, and as a result, they would make fewer costly errors in their work. Hiring morestaff to ensure that the same amount of work would be accomplished would not result in additional payroll costs because four-day employees would only be paid 80 percent of the normal rate. In the end, companies would have fewer overworked and error-prone employees for the same money, which would increase company profits. For the country as a whole, one of the primary benefits of offering this option to employees is that it would reduce unemployment rates. If many full-time employees started working fewer hours, some of their workload would have to be shifted to others. Thus, for every four employees who went on an 80 percent week, a new employee could be hired at the 80 percent rate. Finally, the option of a four-day workweek would be better for individual employees. Employees who could afford a lower salary in exchange for more free time could improve the quality of their lives by spending the extra time with their families, pursuing private interests, or enjoying leisure activities.
The reading states that a mandatory policy force the companies to give and option of 4-days week with 80 percent of the salary to their current workers. The author things that it benefits the companies profits and the lives of employees and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that it has no benefits for them and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the article states that shortened workweek would increase the companies profits. The professor refutes this point by saying that it force the companies to spend more money because the employees would work four day but their healthcare would be the same. He states that that new employees need more offices and more computers which need more money.
Second, the article avers that this strategy will bring more chance for others to have jobs. since some employees work four days of the week, the company need one employee four each four employees that decided to work four days a week. However, the professor declares that if some employees work four days a week, the company might expect them to do the same amount of job that they did in five days. According to professor this cause not only will not create more chances for jobless people, but also cause that employees become unpleasant.
Third, the article posits that four-day workweek brings better life for workers. The professor opposes this point by saying that it will bring some threat to their lives which lessen the qualities of their lives since some of them are in the risk of losing their jobs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Since
...ng more chance for others to have jobs. since some employees work four days of the we...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'third']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.270175438596 0.261695866417 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.147368421053 0.158904122519 93% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0561403508772 0.0723426182421 78% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0245614035088 0.0435111971325 56% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0491228070175 0.0277247811725 177% => OK
Prepositions: 0.122807017544 0.128828473217 95% => OK
Participles: 0.0140350877193 0.0370669169778 38% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.16083788451 2.5805825403 84% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0280701754386 0.0208969081088 134% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.136842105263 0.128158765124 107% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0245614035088 0.0158828679856 155% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0105263157895 0.0114777025283 92% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1558.0 1645.83664459 95% => OK
No of words: 265.0 271.125827815 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87924528302 6.08160592843 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.04852973271 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.332075471698 0.374372842146 89% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.233962264151 0.287516216867 81% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.154716981132 0.187439937562 83% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0867924528302 0.113142543107 77% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16083788451 2.5805825403 84% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48679245283 0.539623497131 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 45.97922457 53.8517498576 85% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0529801325 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0833333333 21.7502111507 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2841639014 49.3711431718 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.833333333 132.220823453 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 21.7502111507 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.878197800319 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 45.4795597484 50.5018328374 90% => OK
Elegance: 1.84126984127 1.90840788429 96% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331871532962 0.549887131256 60% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.174283763042 0.142949733639 122% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.138904745714 0.0787303798458 176% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.637151269326 0.631733273073 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.153167865017 0.139662658121 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157894969355 0.266732575781 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0931020265796 0.103435571967 90% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.383524450052 0.414875509568 92% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0218253539717 0.0530846634433 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228534912058 0.40443939384 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0718505384357 0.0528353158467 136% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.2958057395 97% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.