Working as group in project
According to the listening passage lecturer describe about disadvantages of group work based on six months trial result, that is explained advantages of working as group in reading passage. From the beginning to the end lecturer have struck contrast with the reading passage that accomplishing new project by group results more failure and slowing the process of revealing skilled employee.
First of all, the reading passage states that varieties of individual have more high range of knowledge and skills comparing to one, which illustrating the idea that higher number of people solve an issue based on different type of experiences with higher speed. However, the lecturer refutes this point by in the group, there could be some free-rider relied on their team member or also, individual worked in high performance comparing to other team member may not known in company. For example, even the team is organized from member with highly skilled and poorly skilled person team result will be the same. But co-workers could not recognize who works well nor who is free-rider.
Secondly, the passage points out that every team member can explain their own ideas which will be filtered by other team members. And, in the result, project performance will precious due to its varies of ideas. But, lecturer quite dismissed this statement that group of people always gives different idea which does not accepted by others. Finally, this process decrease the length of project, even lead to the failure.
In sum, the lecturer is disagree with the statement that working as group in project is not effective way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 25, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
...o the failure. In sum, the lecturer is disagree with the statement that working as grou...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1348.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14503816794 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5004515646 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56106870229 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6372495506 49.2860985944 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.545454545 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8181818182 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.90909090909 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303948359926 0.272083759551 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128362212889 0.0996497079465 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127001542034 0.0662205650399 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248421201928 0.162205337803 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138655187095 0.0443174109184 313% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.7273730684 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.2008830022 170% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.