The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how there causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart describes the main reason of land degradation in the world during the 1990s. The table illustrates the proportion of less productive land in three regions.
The most striking feature from the pie chart is that the land degradation only caused by three component. There are over-grazing, over-cultivation and deforestation. Each of that causes take around one-third of all land. Furthermore, from the three main reasons, over-cultivation has the smallest percentage. It is around 28%, while, deforestation has bigger percentage than over-cultivation. The difference between them is 2%. There are only 7% of land that does not caused by the three main reasons.
The table shows that over-cultivation is the main reason of land degradation in North America. However, In Europe, deforestation has the highest percentage for causes of land degradation. In contrast, the main reason of unproductive land in Oceania is caused by over-grazing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ss productive land in three regions. The most striking feature from the pie char...
^^^
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'component' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'components'.
Suggestion: components
...e land degradation only caused by three component. There are over-grazing, over-cultivati...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 809.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 147.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50340136054 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48200454523 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.49573826732 2.65546596893 132% => OK
Unique words: 76.0 106.607317073 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517006802721 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.1702895127 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 67.4166666667 112.824112599 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.25 22.9334400587 53% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.58333333333 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310940726091 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125546759756 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104791963963 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254134921444 0.15604864568 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0802190972756 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.73 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.