In the reading, the author claims that coal ash which produced in power plants during the burning of the coal has some harmful chemical materials and there are new regulations for handling it but power companies didn't accept them by pointing out 3 reasons of support. However, finding all the ideas questionable and implausible, the lecturer totally repudiates this claim and presents some evidence to the contrary.
At first, the author argues that there are some environmental regulations in this matter and companies should use liner-special material which prevents coal ash from leaking into the soil or surrounding environment. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that it's not sufficient and companies which produce these liner-special materials are not good enough, thus it may much of coal ash leak into drink water and it's so harmful!
in addition, the reading passage holds the view that companies can recycle coal ash according to the rules. on the other hand, the lecturer disputes this reason by clarifying the fact that consumers can recycle the coal ash while they're accepting new regulation.
Finally, the author asserts that these new regulations can cause some increase in bill prices that people should pay it as the last point for supporting the efficiency of the rules that existed before. The lecturer, though, dismisses it by pointing out that this increase is just about 1 percent in every bill and it doesn't matter if people pay this cost for preventing environmental issues.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ons for handling it but power companies didnt accept them by pointing out 3 reasons o...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...into drink water and its so harmful! in addition, the reading passage holds the...
^^
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...ecycle coal ash according to the rules. on the other hand, the lecturer disputes t...
^^
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
...onsumers can recycle the coal ash while theyre accepting new regulation. Finally, t...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 318, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...st about 1 percent in every bill and it doesnt matter if people pay this cost for prev...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, however, if, may, so, thus, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1272.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19183673469 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71804251292 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575510204082 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 13.0662251656 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 21.2450331126 165% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.387004694 49.2860985944 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 181.714285714 110.228320801 165% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.0 21.698381199 161% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.0 7.06452816374 198% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.459803190053 0.272083759551 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.208889995746 0.0996497079465 210% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131880839733 0.0662205650399 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266853115422 0.162205337803 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757679743441 0.0443174109184 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.5 13.3589403974 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.0289183223 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 10.7273730684 186% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.498013245 152% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.