Some people say that modern buildings are ugly and are ruining our towns and cities, especially when these buildings are very different from those around them. Others say that they add variety and interest.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
These days, many spectacular buildings are built which are concern of people in worldwide. Some people state that these buildings will damage cities’ image, others believe that they help towns take a lot of advantages. I mainly agree with diversity of large structures.
One reason for this is that building gigantic constructions is vitally important in promoting economic development. These structures not only revive the impression of a country on a global scale by creating all shapes and sizes, they also can be good for tourism. This means that they advance national and international travels which bring an abundance of benefits for a global village. For instance, the Eiffel Tower is one of the most popular tourist destinations in France, and most people in the world want to take advantage of once-in-a-lifetime opportunities to appreciate it. Furthermore, France’s government can earn lots of money from the Eiffel Tower such as hotel business, restaurants, etc. As a result, it brings revenue to the city.
This is not to say that eye- catching buildings are not good in all aspects. In fact, building one erection will destroy a part of nature and culture. Native culture changes are essential problems for some people, they might loose the city's spirit which symbolizes the spirit of indigenous people because of visitors who come from different countries. Yet, the profit of these constructions are much more than the short-coming of that.
To sum up, striking and massive constructions are able to attract tourists so that they increase a higher standard life of inhabitants, and state-owned organisation can enjoy long-term benefits. Meanwhile, we should not overlook these buildings’ negative effects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...result, it brings revenue to the city. This is not to say that eye- catching bu...
^^^
Line 5, column 227, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...al problems for some people, they might loose the citys spirit which symbolizes the s...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e spirit of indigenous people because of visitors who come from different countri...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, look, so, while, for instance, in fact, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36263736264 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01797714955 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637362637363 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1284572097 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206321555055 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635893960727 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595808564007 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129680869174 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625203531327 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.