The graph shows data about the average Saturday sales of two bakeries in london in 2010 Summerize the information by selecting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph shows data about the average Saturday sales of two bakeries in london in 2010. Summerize the information by selecting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The graph illustrates the mean number of items sold by the two bakeries- namely Lovely Loves and Bernie's Buns- in London, on Saturdays in the year 2010.
Overall, Doughnuts and toasted sandwiches represent the maximum and minimum sales respectively for both the bakeries in that year.
Bernie's buns sold more than 100 cakes, whereas Lovely Loave had not even close to 80 cakes in the year 2010. Similarly, the average number of cookies sold by Bernie's buns is as twice as that of the Lovely loaves with the number almost 120 and around 60 respectively. While Bernie's Buns sold about 78 rolls, Lovely Loaves had sales of only around 50. Similarly, The earlier bakery had over 60% of the total sales of Crisps, whilst the latter had below 40%. Hitting the sales of almost 140 and 120 for Bernies and Lovely Loaves respectively, Doughnut had maximum demand and supply in London for both the bakeries.
Fresh Loaves and Salads are the only two categories out of eight in which Lovely Loaves bakery outraced Bernie's Buns in terms of the number of items sold by around 50 for former and 40 for later. However, toasted sandwiches are the only items in which both the bakery had almost the same number of sales i.e. around 23.

Votes
Average: 8.6 (44 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st 120 and around 60 respectively. While Bernies Buns sold about 78 rolls, Lovely...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, similarly, so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1012.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72897196262 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24482012618 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490654205607 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0928437083 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.444444444 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122184479083 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652176799087 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442422687106 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.097840474629 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498206047203 0.0819641961636 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.